Chinese indigenous pre 1960s equipment: ???
This is very funny
2 Likes
multirole aircraft for 9.3?? I don’t think so but hey maybe if they actually fixed the Q-5s they wouldn’t be so abysmal, I still find it ridiculous that only the 10.3 Q-5 can carry 500kg bombs when the Q-5A and Q-5 initial can carry them too(pretty sure the initial could only carry 1 though) and to this day the flare count hasn’t been buffed despite an image of the flare dispenser showing 42 CM, on 10.3 like the other guy said the JL-9, JL-10, J-7H and a couple of others
damn it would be nice to have it
7 Likes
yeah I see a lot of hate around here, makes you wish they didn’t even released the statement to begin with
Why is the CM25 not amphibious even though it was purpose built to be by the ROC for the ROCMC
1 Like
What aircraft is that that looks really interesting
It should and so should M163, but gaijin actually removed their ability to swim for bs reasons. They seem to have hatred towards M113 frame
3 Likes
Both those vehicles are equipped with the swimgear
IRL they also have a snorkel which needs to be attached which is why gaijin removed their swimming capability even though they have pontoons.
Though many other floating vehicles in the game also need preperation time IRL which gaijin doesn’t nerf
2 Likes
JL9,a trainer,also call FTC2000(Export oriented),Southeast Asian countries equipped
1 Like
JL10（L15），both（FTC2000 and L15） multirole fighter（for small countries）
4 Likes
Would be cool indeed, but we all know Gaijin is gonna make these either premium, bad or both
1 Like
k8,maybe like L39 in game.
it can use pl5 and aim9,but maybe it don’t have in game,RB maybe 6.7.
2 Likes
What gun does it have?
30mm gunpod,250kg bombs,130-2and90-1（maybe？it have rocket projectile）
it also can use LS6（GPS） and YJ9（ASM）
4 Likes
Thank you for the help <3
This is false btw.
They may be both Bulpups, but the SAR-21 is not a derivative or licence reproduction of the TAR-21.
1 Like
Yep, especially with the recent clashes between cambodia and thailand.
Probably should’ve added a degree of clarity there - the IglaGavin has a justification to go to Russia. While I wouldn’t advocate it, I’d advocate it more than putting Singers in the China tree.
When can we get the issues fixed?
1 Like
Singapore should be in the Chinese tech tree if Japan was to get Thailand and Indonesia
1 Like