There is 0 issue with information availability with British tanks. There are over 200 suggestions for British ground forces additions alone on these forums, most of which are very well sourced with essentially everything the Gaijin would need to add them.
Like you yourself have pointed out, it’s been essentially 1:1 for the past 5 years, and we’re seeing a consistent amount of foreign additions every update. No sign of this ratio changing across recent updates or in the future.
Completely irrelevant with regards to a video game where each nation supposedly receives the same-ish amount of vehicles on an update-by-update or year-by-yesr basis. Like I already made very clear, Britain has an absolute abundance of domestic vehicles left to add, and if you compared the domestic additions to Britain and the domestic ground tech tree additions to US, Germany, and USSR over the last 5 years it would become abundantly clear how much getting two sub trees torpedoes domestic content. But you aren’t going to do that, are you, because it would end up proving yourself completely wrong.
USA has even more content left to add than UK.
“Clearly the lack of subtrees torpedoes domestic additions. USA is suffering because it has 3x more vehicles left to add than UK.” - Devil’s Advocate argument using the rationale of your post [note I did not say “logic”, that word is misused most of the time].
Of course mentioning USA, USSR, and Germany proves your posts wrong.
If USA, and USSR got sub-trees, their content addition would not change.
In-fact, I’ll talk about 2020 Britain additions. 25 ground vehicles were added from 2021 to 2025. About 7 per year.
In 2020, Britain got ADATS [Canada], VFM-5, Matilda Hedgehog, Stuart I & III, Challenger 2F, and Rooikat 105. 7 vehicles, and 2 weren’t domestic.
So since Gaijin added the South African sub-tree, domestic ground vehicles added to Britain has increased from 5 per year to 7 per year.
“The addition of sub-trees boosts domestic additions.” - A hypothetical argument I do not believe.
Development takes time, and last update added 55 vehicles. The average per update is 42.
In time more British vehicles come, and in 3 years time there will be 50 - 100+ more domestic British vehicles in the game.
And no, the ratio has not been 1:1.
Half of Britain’s sub-tree tanks came in 1 update in 2021, literally half.
So in reality new additions SINCE the sub-tree addition are more than 2:1 just in ground, and over 3:1 in air, sea, helicopters, and ground.
I saw this post when it was made but I’ve been busy & couldn’t get by until now.
I’m disappointed. Not only is this effectively a non answer the fact is you made a choice to capitulate to the Chinese ultra nationalism by not placing the VT-4 in the Japanese tree as part of the Thai tech tree. That’s all there really is to say about that.
As far as planned sub trees I’m not sure I fully support some of the choices. I feel like there are better options.
Could be, I’m also all for small nations as long as they’re unique. Could you provide a concept tech tree, I’m curious on what they’d offer as a standalone tree
Also, in case you hadn’t noticed, China has precisely no reason to get a Singapore tree. There’s not really any political relationship (best I can tell is its a fairly neutral relationship, with Singers having a disapproving view on the 9 Dash Line), and from a technical point of view, Russia has a better argument to getting Singers, with since it has the IglaGavin (M113A2 with a Igla launcher).
The US, Germans, French and British all have substantially better claims with regards to technical relationships (Britain probably a significantly better one politically, but seeing as that’s contentious for other reasons i’ll refrain)
Also the Abbot (before we forget that thing), a long requested addition, already half exists in game, sonce it shares a hull with the Falcon. Of dubious effectiveness? Probably? Fun? Definitely (not)
China and Singapore have better relations than Singapore and Russia.
Neither should get it though. It’d fit best in Israel or Japan, but only if Israel doesn’t get Chile and Colombia or if Japan follows the more ASEAN route.
As a Japanese citizen, I request that you refrain from intentionally introducing the non-competitive VT4. It falls short of the Type 10 tank and the Oprood in every aspect except APS, and only demands additional RP, creating unnecessary political issues for Gaijin.
Even though Singapore is best in Israel I’d rather Israel have Chile and Colombia as it follows Asean route for Japan and the Commonwealth for Britain. Having some South American tech in Israel follows this region trend imho
Irrelevant answers. All existing errors in Chinese vehicles should be completely fixed before new vehicles are released! New vehicles and weapons released in the future shouldn’t have any issues.😠😡🤬
The VT-4 problem can be solved like this:
Do not give JP tree, instead giving it to CN as a PREMIUM or EVENT, just like Class 3(p) is a South Africa vehicle but it is in DE event vehicle.
We don’t need a sub-tech tree. We have enough foreign trade vehicles. If we connect them together, we will have a complete sub-tech tree, including main battle tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, light tanks, and air defense systems.
