Chile, Colombia, more of their own vehicles
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I think they’re still American vehicles, but they’re American second when in Service. They are RoC first, American second.
1 Like
To be honest, this is actually quite interesting. When the French complained about Leclerc’s unexpectedly poor protection, their solution was to give the Leopards from the Low Countries to the French. When everyone questioned the protection of the Ariete, their solution was to add Hungary’s Leopard 2 A7HU to Italy.
6 Likes
Hispanic nations have a potential to become their own TT, there are plenty of interesting vehicles and concepts that would make it unique, more so if you add Brazil!
IMHO Israel shouldn’t have even been added, it’s all just Pattons and Merkavas, straight up boring, and any subtree will most likely cause lots of drama. Though again these statements of mine aren’t really on the topic of this thread.
Something something about giving Canadian Leopards to the UK instead of fixing the Chally.
Yeah I’ll gladly take that L from my 2023 self. In my defense I also never expected Gaijin to go down this path to where we are today. At least I will admit that I’ve f’d up my response in the past.
(I swear, if military exercises-large scale diplomacy can be used as reasons for adding a sub tree, US tree would be as large as, if not larger than, UK + Commonwealth tree…)
We should just get rid of nation locks by that point, just let everyone form their own line up with any vehicles they want.
1 Like
It can only be said that the reason why Britain did not become so absurd is entirely because India did not have enough available vehicles to join Britain and form its own subtree.
1 Like
I still think Chile and Colombia fits with Israel honestly. In the Latin America Suggestion,, Chile contributes a fair amount but without it in that tree it would still be larger than the current Israeli tree and possibly with another subtree, be fairly large (4-5 Lines).
Israel could’ve easily been in a Nation Folder w/ the US. A lot of the vehicles are practically sub-variants of eachother. I mean theres like seven Magach 6s alone.
“I heard you want another Magach?” -Gaijin devs, probably
1 Like
Mind explaining why almost every single post ww2 chinese jet in the game is an export vehicle derivative then?
seems like most of it is by monetary means
2 Likes
Supports the point of adding or moving them to the US then instead of China.
IMO, it wouldn’t have been such a problem if Gaijin took care to present any difference between every different operators, even if only operator-specific ordnances, and not be solely concerned with the need to have something at a specific BR. Annoyingly, Gaijin selectively does this.
Take the ROCAF F-16A MLU for example. The only possible explanation for its current spot is the F-CK-1A not being sufficiently declassified, and for reasons not disclosed to us Gaijin doesn’t want to put F-16/79 (a what-if and almost-happened one at that, but that never stopped Gaijin before) there. Instead we’re (also in the case of Italian ADF) almost just riding the American ADF bandwagon…
Hey wasn’t Indonesia planning on buying some J-10s?
1 Like
Gaijin be like
Brits rejecting the idea of the Bhishma and other Indian vehicles being added to their tree?
Who cares.
Chinese players complaining about the idea of the VT-4 being added to Japan?
OMG BETTER NOT ANGER THAT COMMUNITY!!!
5 Likes
British players just need to put enough pressure on Gaijin, and hurt them in some way if they want to accomplish major things for the game. The EN community also needs to realize that we can do this too if we united to get a major issue fixed, such as the economy or BR compression.
They already angered the Chinese community with the VT-4 situation, as well as the improper modelling of a lot of Chinese tanks and several planes.
2 Likes
There isnt enough of us trust me we try.
We just want to be treated as good as the chinese are
4 Likes