Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

(I swear, if military exercises-large scale diplomacy can be used as reasons for adding a sub tree, US tree would be as large as, if not larger than, UK + Commonwealth tree…)

We should just get rid of nation locks by that point, just let everyone form their own line up with any vehicles they want.

1 Like

It can only be said that the reason why Britain did not become so absurd is entirely because India did not have enough available vehicles to join Britain and form its own subtree.

monkey-paw

1 Like

I still think Chile and Colombia fits with Israel honestly. In the Latin America Suggestion,, Chile contributes a fair amount but without it in that tree it would still be larger than the current Israeli tree and possibly with another subtree, be fairly large (4-5 Lines).

Israel could’ve easily been in a Nation Folder w/ the US. A lot of the vehicles are practically sub-variants of eachother. I mean theres like seven Magach 6s alone.

“I heard you want another Magach?” -Gaijin devs, probably

1 Like

Mind explaining why almost every single post ww2 chinese jet in the game is an export vehicle derivative then?

seems like most of it is by monetary means
image

2 Likes

Supports the point of adding or moving them to the US then instead of China.

IMO, it wouldn’t have been such a problem if Gaijin took care to present any difference between every different operators, even if only operator-specific ordnances, and not be solely concerned with the need to have something at a specific BR. Annoyingly, Gaijin selectively does this.

Take the ROCAF F-16A MLU for example. The only possible explanation for its current spot is the F-CK-1A not being sufficiently declassified, and for reasons not disclosed to us Gaijin doesn’t want to put F-16/79 (a what-if and almost-happened one at that, but that never stopped Gaijin before) there. Instead we’re (also in the case of Italian ADF) almost just riding the American ADF bandwagon…

Hey wasn’t Indonesia planning on buying some J-10s?

1 Like

Gaijin be like

Brits rejecting the idea of the Bhishma and other Indian vehicles being added to their tree?
Who cares.

Chinese players complaining about the idea of the VT-4 being added to Japan?
OMG BETTER NOT ANGER THAT COMMUNITY!!!

5 Likes

British players just need to put enough pressure on Gaijin, and hurt them in some way if they want to accomplish major things for the game. The EN community also needs to realize that we can do this too if we united to get a major issue fixed, such as the economy or BR compression.

They already angered the Chinese community with the VT-4 situation, as well as the improper modelling of a lot of Chinese tanks and several planes.

2 Likes

There isnt enough of us trust me we try.

We just want to be treated as good as the chinese are

4 Likes

And I’m sure the ROC isn’t a fan of PRC military vehicles either, but that is entirely irrelevant. The techtree is China, not just PRC (Peoples Republic of China), not just ROC (Republic of China), it’s China.

Just like there is no “Nazi Germany” tree, there’s only a Germany tree, which includes the German Empire, Nazi Germany, DDR (GDR?) and modern day BRD (FRG?). This means that the militaries of all these nations are placed in this techtree because each of them Individually is/was Germany.

10 Likes

Not sure if this is the right way to see it. There should be a fair system that all nations are treated by and all players can advocate for keeping. This shouldn’t be a competition about who can complain better.

At least this current situation should be good practice for that tough, since it’s one of the rare times Chinese and international players come together against basically the same issue.

Exactly. Been trying to say this too.

Does that mean that britain is finally allowed the British Empire? because it was Britain? :-)

Gaijin would never

i really dont care about adding vt4 to japan, but i also think its bad idea. Why ?, well japan have a good top tier lineup and it can still get others sub-tree like the phillipines or Indonesia or malaysian or singapore or even south korea. and for china, there is no need to add subtree, its good from the low to top tier and it will better when they start adding the others flankers. even so if they decide to add a subtree, there is north korea with the upgraded mig29 pl12 and maybe new su27, or vietnam.

1 Like

Same would apply to the USSR tree, if Gaijin actually added more former Soviet nations vehicles to that tree

Though I suppose it is a good thing that these former Soviet nations aren’t a big part of the tree, as a lot of them switched over to NATO equipment