No one said that.
I’m saying it’s done as a balancing metric, the fact that the CR2 report for its STANAG level was completely binned, shows that.
If it had its correct protection levels it would stop substantially more types of ammunition giving NATO MBTs’ even more advantages.
I never said the CR2 was balanced, I said the ERA for NATO tanks is done this way to give some balance.
The basket, is attached to the ring, if you destroy a turret basket, which can and does impede the actual turret turning then yes it would stop the turret turning
What is hard to understand about that concept¿
With them being far more open about it than literally any other report?
All other ones are either binned, or completely ignored.
The breach is orange, not disabled.
You realise it can go red then black before it’s disabled right?
In most real scenarios in game I tend to find myself losing the turret ring and possibly the vertical aiming drive when someone has rushed me, then I can fire back and take them out.
You on the other hand are taking abrams into open fields and wondering why you’re getting hammered.
- as is DM53 on the rhiemental 120s.
- the Leopard 2a4 IRL can fire DM53, unless im wrong @dotSHINI knows way more than I on the capabilities of leopards, as far as I am aware 2A4 can fire DM53.
Source?
the M1A2 and the M1A1 HC should be at least 12.3 that is everyones point here.
So again, you are saying move the Sep V2 and V1 down to 12.0 the same as the M1A2 is.
when they are objectively better due to commander thermals as well as Gen 2 thermals.
which again means move them down lol.
the M1A2 should NOT be lower than the plethora of 12.7s we now have which it is either on par with or just flat out better than.
As are the turret baskets and additional Modules.
the turret baskets sit pretty damn low in the tanks bud dunno where you’re getting the idea they dont. as well as this they changed the models of them after release so there was less to hit through the center point.
what’s with the question marks?
the only one the su cant pen, which I stated above as I used the Marder 3 for it, is the CR2. which is still a rank 2 TD.
As shown in all screenshots.
Not if it’s going to destroy entire brackets.
right now the M1A1, IPM1 and such are absolutely dominating the 10.3 area.
As well as the 11,0 area is all but gone due to constant uptiers to 12.0 facing off against abrams in tanks like the ZTZ99 II.
This is the first “offensive” thing I’ve said.
It’s not offensive to tell you that you have been lying, making false statements, as well as catagorically denying facts such as the 3BM46 can’t pen the M1A2.
Yet you keep up the chirade as if all of us are wrong?
As well as misquoting me, which is disingenious as hell, and wonder why I’m saying you have issues with reading comprehension? .
The main reason I said that was due to you acting as if waht I said was the CR2 has the exact reload of the Abrams and isn’t a flaw. when what I really said was it only has a 5 second reload for the first 4 rounds. Past the ready rack it loses a lot of time.
