The AGS at 12.0 with M833, multiple br increases in a year and no M900 added? I just do not understand this change.
3 Likes
1 Like
Then tell me how a spaa that constantly griefs you by locking random things at any given time (also swaps your missile guidance instantly, making you lose the target) is top tier material when there are spaa like the iris that shoot you down before you even spawn
this is unfair. If you have played more than ten top-tier matches in September and October, or if you have personally piloted these helicopters, you would easily notice that their kill efficiency varies significantly. The best performer is likely the Mi-28, followed by the AH-64E and the Z-10. These helicopters can counter infrared missiles and are equipped with FNF missiles that have a longer range. The remaining helicopters are equipped with Spike and PARS missiles with a range of only seven to eight kilometers, which are completely incomparable to the Production 305. The worst among them is probably the German Tiger UHT, mainly because it lacks a cannon and has a missile range of only seven kilometers. It also cannot counter infrared missiles.
If Gaijin truly intends to balance the game, they could have left the older helicopters unchanged and only moved the newer ones to higher tiers. Specifically, the Mi-28 should be placed at 13.0, while the AH-64E and Z-10 could be placed at 12.7. This one-size-fits-all approach raises doubts about whether the development team genuinely aims to balance them.
5 Likes
CLAWS remain 12.0 lmao. There is a worse AA than the CLAWS at 12.7.
I can’t believe that the US gets this lucky and instead of keeping quiet some US mains complain even more lol.
1 Like
M1A1 and RAH-66 should not avoid the br changes
6 Likes
meanwhile the buk, pantsir, iris t and etc… still 12.7 and the mm and the br system still trash too gj
1 Like
no tanks should go to 12.7 except the L2A7s,122s,80bvm and90m,most tanks just not powerful enoigh as them
3 Likes
M1A1 100% should be 11.7. RAH-66 could be 11.7 but it’s pretty dogshit against good SACLOS SPAA players.
IRIS can be defeated by a blind shitfuck heli with their monitor off without them even lifting a finger to defend themselves.
The missiles’ irccm fucks it up constantly because it shuts off the seeker when it sees flares or multiple munitions next to each other.
Out of all the top tier SPAAs, I’ve found the IRIS-T the easiest to defeat.
(Ignoring Spyder, claws and swedish IRIS-T). Those are just worse
2 Likes
You’d think they’d have added more top tier SPAA’s before increasing ground BR.
Or just made the top tier SPAAs actually counter the broken CAS
Mby also bring the french EC-665 Tiger HAC to 13.0 like all the other EC with spikes and pars missiles. I mean its a allmost an exact copy of the german EC thats sitting at 13.0 and not 12.3 like the french.
And when are the helicopter XP modifiers going to be changed? Right now, unlocking helicopter modules is a real pain due to the low XP they give you per game and the huge amount the modules cost.
4 Likes
I feel like its not a really good game design that if I bring the most advanced anti air system it puts me in a disadvantage if the enemy spawns in helis with LDIRCM. Also if a tiger UHT launches all 8 of its PARS missiles he hardly gets a kill, while the LMUR oneshots consistantly. Please reconsider the changes, altough you probably wont because that way you wouldnt be able to milk players for buying 12.3 premiums instead of them being 11.7.
God no, only DIRCCM helis deserve the 13.0 br
None of the non-dircm f&f helis should be 13.0
1 Like
It’s all timed to the sales, then a surprise update adds new vehicles. Grind worsens afterward, with SL costs rising to make playing expensive. We’ve seen it with summer sales leading to later hikes.
How aren’t the 2A5 and 2A6 the same BR? Why does 30mm of extra penetration but longer barrel equate to a whole 0.3 BR difference?
Why is the 2PL (even with DM53) the same BR as the 2A5 when the 2A5 has better UFP and turret armour?
How is the VT5, Al Khalid, and MBT-2000 at a higher BR than the M1A1?
How is the VT5 the same BR as the Type 90 if the Type 90 is basically the VT5 but better in every way other turret rotation speed, thermals, and the ability to scout?
How is the CS/SA5 not a 12.3 SPAA?
Why is the Pantsir still 12.0 when it could just as easily be 12.3?
Why does barely functioning APS warrant a 0.3 BR increase between the Merkava Mk.4M and the Merkava Mk.4M?
How is the T-90M at 12.7 with its garbage reload (even after a Russia + China autoloader buff) and abysmal gun depression and reverse speed?
Why does the Type 90 stay at 11.7 but the TKX (P) go to 12.0?
Why does the AGS go to 12.0 when it still is shooting M833? Give it M900 already!
Does the APS of the T-80UM2 really warrant being the same BR as the T-80U and T-80UK?
Why is the the VT4 same BR as the WZ1001 (E) LCT? VT4 is just straight up worse!
How the hell is the M1A1 HC and the M1A2 SEP 0.7 BR different?
The only difference is the add-on ERA package and better thermals!
6 Likes
This is a step in the right direction for sure but incomplete at best. Please consider spreading top tier SPAAs over different BRs. The newer ones just aren’t comparable to the old. FlaRakRad and IRIST do not have comparable capabilities and should therefore not be this similar in br. I suggest moving all the newer SPAAs up in BR with at least IRIST and BUK to 13.0. This will lead to a better CAS-to-SPAA balance as only 14.0 aircraft should constantly face the best of the best AAs. Right now playing Aircraft that are 11.0 in ground rb is completely nonviable.
1 Like