Inaccuracies on BUK-M3 ADMS

Export, yes .

Then do you have something that says non export one uses ARH?

btw

this video confirms that it has TVC right ?

I have answered that already :

Im just point to the fact that the brochure you posted is about 9M317ME missile which as the name implies is the export variant .

Yes, it has TVC, you can see it on the missile

1 Like

Was there any doubt that it had TVC ?

And you are yet to prove M is ARH.

That is your interpretation of M being ARH.

You asked if there is any evidence, there is.

Is there any evidence that it isn’t ? 9M317ME won’t do …

Yeah on the last Dev it pulled like an R-73 hopefully Gaijin have modelled the mass for the updated Dev

is it possible to simply ask gaijin to provide sources for the 9M317MA ?

No, there is not.

They dont share sources, LMUR is the same they say x8 but we have no evidence…

So, what is the evidence. ME wont do, but give me the evidence for M being ARH.
No, the fact the seeker with no direct connection to 9M317M exists is not any proof.

what seeker is used on the 9M317ME ?

TVC blades can be seen better here

image

Idk the seeker name/desigantion. Neither do i nor anyone whom i asked, who are interested in russian military, both foreign and russian.

Please stop the offtopic , hit me up on the LMUR / helicopter page and i will provide you all the evidence you ask for and some more. Just because you don’t know don’t assume others don’t aswell …

I hope it’s better than your BUK evidence…Gaijin doesnt ask much when it comes to Russian sources.

9E420 or some upgraded variant of it

‘‘My’’ BUK evidence comes from the manufacturer … like what more could possibly satisfy your special needs XD.