As per title here is a thread regrouping all the inaccuracies on BUK-M3 :
- Incorrect radar/TAR : Community Bug Reporting System
- Incorrect combat disposition : Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
As expect the level of technical moderation is appalling. Report has been closed without giving any valid argument. Both arguments given by technical moderation are erroneous.
- Arguments used :
The Buk-M3 system came in various variations.
- As mentioned in the report , yes BUK-M3 is compatible with older TAR or TEL components from previous BUK-M2 or M1-2 standards. However that does not mean that these do represent the BUK-M3 standard as used by the Russian forces.
This clearly demonstrates that technical moderation doesn’t even bother reading the reports to which they respond to !
you have a brochure for the export version. Not a bug
- That argument is irrelevant , export variant and domestically used variant are identical in terms of the units used and their combat disposition.
1 Like
any info on if the missiles is SARH or ARH
9M317M is ARH , last SARH was 9M317 of the BUK-M2 system but ARH seekers have existed even for them or the old 9M38 missile of the BUK-M1-2 standard.
As you can see per Agat documentation their ARH seekers of the 9B1103M family and Slanets family which supposedly is the nickname for the 9B1103M2 family of seekers are universal and come in a range of diameters in order to adapt to both AtA and GtA missiles .
1 Like