I’ve already asked seniors and the best that he can get is the orange that I’ve edited myself. Those two cannot be used.
2 Likes
Are we actually going to talk about the Ki-67 or what T_T
What you’re telling me is the Forum devs never bothered to add proper coding for an RGB Color Model. That’s just sad honestly. Well have a good one then, don’t know why your replying to me.
1 Like
This is a document discovered by @skultew1234, and it is a source about the Ki-67 and Ki-109. I have quickly read through the tests of the Ki-109 included in this document, and there seem to be several differences from the game. I would like to look into it more closely and submit a bug report.
- The cockpit layout is incorrect. The left-side copilot seat has been removed, and space is needed for the loader and magazine of the 75 mm gun.
- The bomb load is missing. The Ki-109 is capable of dive bombing.
- The sight is incorrect. It should be equipped with a telescopic sight of 2x or 4x magnification, not a reflector sight.
- Bulletproof glass for the pilot is missing. The bulletproof glass has not been removed.
“Regarding the submission of the memorandum of the meeting based on the shooting and bombing test results of the Ki-109 No. 1” October 11, 1944.
To the Technical Department of the Army Aviation Headquarters
From Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Nagoya Aircraft Manufacturing Plant
https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/military_history_search/DetailMok?id=0060064842
10 Likes
Here’s 3 pics of the Ki-67’s Cockpit, the first one isn’t great quality and the 3 is of the mockup prototype however if anybody wants to make a model of the cockpit this could be a good start especially considering that Gaijin isn’t going to make bomber cockpits anytime soon
2 Likes
Pulled from gunsight.jp
1 Like
To whoever who makes the report - don’t forget to mention that 20mm turret ranges should be fixed as it is able to fire though the fuselage below the plane.
Haven’t those been reported many times along the years?
I checked now and I only see bug reports about the front turret wrong firing angles, unability to fire exactly to the front etc. But if it was reported, then it’s fine. Though, won’t hurt to remind Gaijin of it.
1 Like
The fact that Gaijin doesn’t know how to fix the nose and tail turrets boggles my mind. It’s a simple peg and slot mechanism
2 Likes
@Teh0 @PercussionCap @BiFoxGuy
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qCjInRkh5tbt6gltbi-fkKJOuIKe8lQr?usp=drive_link
Notice how the glass dome has to turn completely before firing again; you can see how in the gunner view, the green reticle rotates completely around. And then in the chase camera, you see how it rotates, even though the gun mount doesn’t… sigh. It should really look like this:
(Also, Teh0, if you could repost your images here, that would be wonderful)
2 Likes
I get what you’re saying, but I don’t see how the glass dome would rotate like that. It would have to rotate side to side on a vertical axis, and the part on the side the gun turns towards would have to go inside the tail gunner compartment.
Wdym? I’m just saying it shouldn’t have to rotate separately
I would love to have under-wing bomb racks on the Ki-67.
If it can carry 2 x 500kg + 15 x 50kg or 2 x 250kg + 8 x 100kg, it can destroy 2 small bases in SBEC BR4.7.
5 Likes
Yes. It is very interesting. Probably it even could 3 x800kg bombs since that under wing bomb racks was used for Ke-Go bomb tests and the weight of one is 800kg. But I am not sure Gaijin will add it…
4 Likes
If it could carry 800 kg in the bomb racks under the wings, it would be great for the Japanese tree, which is suffering from a lack of bomb load on its bombers.
If 2 x 800kg + 15 x 50kg can be installed, it will be possible to destroy 3 small bases at BR 4.7 and 2 at BR 5.0 to 6.3 of SBEC, making it possible to counter the onslaught of enemy bombers.
In order to get Gaijin to implement it, it would be necessary to make suggestions in terms of game balance regarding bomb loadings.
4 Likes
I believe it should be able to be bug-reported. If the outer wing racks could carry Ke-Go, it could DEFINITLY carry 800 kg dumb boms
2 Likes
My information about the Ki-67-I Otsu radar was wrong. It’s not an H6 radar, it’s a Ta Ki 1.
4 Likes