premiums and not premiums have right to play in rank2 and above where less cheater can reach, the suggestion solely recommending to players with same skill(player level) match with each other witch I believe is the goal of matchmaker
Player level is only equivalent to time played. A lvl 100 player who only plays air will be as good at ground as a level 10 would be.
3 Likes
Or, putting low-level premium players in a separate queue so that they all fight eachother.
Rank literally means nothing in this game.
4 Likes
The player info in the detail section shows their experience in ground, air, and naval combat, as well as which types of tanks or fighters they are most familiar with. In contrast, the image I posted in this thread reveals that all top four opponents are level 100, indicating they have significant experience compare to others. This is evident from the kill-to-death ratio in the first image, where the top player killed eight tanks with zero deaths and captured two points. I aimed to express my point more concisely in my post because excessive detail can make it boring and unnecessarily long.
some of the player base do buy prems tanks wich lead them to high tier games. before the new player even learn the game
I think you don’t realize how little rank correlates with player experience. I’m level 100. The dude from your first screenshot has more battles on that Avenger than I do with all tanks combined.
1 Like
In my previous comment, I mentioned that by the +/- 20 level range I meant the matchmaker also considers players’ Kill-to-Death ratios from ground battles, which are detailed in player info. The matchmaker suggested to takes into account both player experience and tank Battle Ratings to ensure a more enjoyable match for both sides. I won’t delve into specific parameters since I’m not part of the development team, and too much detail can make the post tedious.
Unfortunately, as a new player, I have to compete in Rank 1, even though my tanks are researched to Rank 3. Most veteran players are in Rank 2 and above, forcing me to stay in Rank 1 to avoid them. However, unfair matches still occur. For instance, a level 100 player entered Rank 1 and single-handedly ruined the game for everyone. How can new players enjoy the game and become future veterans when they are unfairly outmatched by much more experienced players? When will the matchmaking system pair players of similar experience levels?
1 Br +? Its to difficult…
They decided long ago not to have skill based matchmaking and rely purely on vehicle BRs. This leaves room for some unbalances…as the 7vs3 you mention…
(bear in mind that the rank only reflects the number of battles, not skill…there is no way i know of to include player win ratios…and i saw lots of “lower level” players being the best in match)
Not sure if they believe skill matchmaking to be manipulable or too hard to mix with BR system…or simply unnecessary.
It doesn’t mean jack. You keep arguing about what type of fighter they’re familiar with.
2017, that’s how long I have been playing 8 years.
Am I good at the game HElllll fricken no and I’ve still gotten people claiming I’m cheating, I shouldn’t be fighting noobs and these responses were based on my level. That doesn’t mean jack to me cause it only ever went higher when I collected vehicles, or did achievements and stuff.
A level 100 player≠player experience.
I can say for sure that the balance issues will never be addressed because it benefits the developers. They know that frustrated players are more likely to spend real money, and that would make more money than doing something about it and increasing new player retention. Also, it would make the sealclubbers cry because they will not be able to punish noobs.
2 Likes
That is why I am always for a ranked mode GRB would solve lot’s of issues but other players say no because they can’t stomp others with closed eyes ;)
Yeahhh, Im not sure what Gaijin is thinking 7.0 means, seems more like 7.0 is permanently 7.7 or 8.0???
I mean - NO tank is really played at their BR now.! The Match making is a complete farce, unbalanced and somewhat BIASED! No really… it does seem that way!! I mean - How is it im actually 84% now (its gone up after again tracking rediculous amount of matches) Used to be 76%, but hey - just makes me work harder doesn’t it! Not being funny but it clearly states “Match Making” maxes out at 4 vehicles +1 BR, doesnt say anything about the rest being +0.7 and you’re constantly sitting at the lower BR with inferior tanks… OHHHHHH no not at all fair is it really.! and whats shockingly obvious it its definitely certain nations being put at the lower BRs.!
1 Like
They need to reduce the uptier/downtier from 3 steps to 2 steps.
5.3 should play vs 4.7 or 6.0 but NOT 4.3 or 6.3
1 Like
Yeah that will NEVER happen as Gaijin state we will end up queuing too long waiting for a match - which I personally think is total bull.!
I’d rather play a balanced match than consistent ridiculous up tiers.! After all if EVERYONE remains in the vicinity of their BR range as you suggest, then there isn’t a problem as there are plenty of players.! Of course if there isn’t - they can always fill the spaces with the Fake Bots they claim aren’t there!!!
1 Like
Agreed. 2 steps will not make a big difference on queue times. There are enough players in the game at any given time to allow for a reasonable queue time with 2 step uptier/downtier. Might even have fewer players leaving in middle of battle.
You have a politician thinking. I like it.
I’m not too sure if that’s a compliment or not, but thank you.