The first F22 is not even close to the Su-57… it gets 9ms and 120c5s. The Su-57 however still has a large radar cross section somehow.
Maybe if it was added with 120B and 9m, but that would be lame.
1 Like
They way they could balance it is by giving the SU 57 the large hypersonic missile they carry. I forgot what it was called but from what I’ve seen that thing is insane
Couldn’t it only carry the C variant becuase the clip wings allowed it to fit
If we consider
F-16 vs MiG-29
or
F-15 vs Su-27
match-up at update teasers.
I think Gaijin will try to add Su-57 as much as possible, when adding F-22.
Only if it is the most modern F-22 which would kill the game so no.
1 Like
Yeah I think I remember seeing something like that. I was mainly saying it to make a point.
nah it can take 120A/B
1 Like
Well back then Gaijin wasn’t as funded and organized.
And yes, I remember the skill issues hundreds… thousands had against F-14As while I never died to their radar missiles.
The F-22 adds only stealth to what we already have in-game.
@Pyro_loogA
New ammo can be added to American and German tanks the moment everyone has equal options, until that point deal with the best MBT round in the game.
AIM-120C is a correct missile for F-22, and is used to this day in C5 form, tho the originals were C1-4.
we already have stealth. F-22 adds no new mechanics, which is why its ripe for addition in december
can be F-22 and Su-35
or, a later F-15 and Su-35 trailer, then it does an F-16 trailer peak moment to switch to F-22
No way I believe that, i’ve seen videos of the best air players dieing to the aim54
Thats just the thing, russia can only get 3bm59, which is pretty similar to 3bm60. I personally don’t think we should hold Nato back because russia can’t keep up. If anything add the t 14 armata and then give the better rounds to nato. But I don’t even think that would help that much if we’re talking about realism.
Unfortunately I think that you’re right that it’s coming sooner rather than later.
I hope they take a break from adding stuff to top tier air because it’s relatively even between all the nations for once.
itll be even once theres an AESA F-15. and why is it a bad thing? there is still F-35 for later, as well as the rest of USAF and USN through cold war and modern.
F-22 is real counterpart to EFT and Rafale anyways
I was using multipathing on DCS prior to Mig-23MLD’s addition into War Thunder, and of course using low altitude in War Thunder since F-4E’s dominance.
I have been a floor jet for… many years now, and that led to zero deaths to AIM-54 until after I got the event Tornado where I was like “You know what? Let’s see what this AIM-54 does.” and I intentionally climbed a little so it’d hit me.
Then multipath changed to 60 meters and I died 2 more times since due to poor positioning.
I very much controlled matches from the floor. Was it correct? Dunno, but it worked and that’s all that really matters.
I used this in Mirage 3C where I died zero times to F-14As, and in Mirage 3E where I died once in a gunfight with a Tomcat cause I misjudged my entry into the furball.
Tbh i play for kills, not wins. I dont play america top tier cause i think the Abrams is AWFUL but i see your frustration. U just gotta pick another nation to enjoy. Thats what happens when you have high expectations for a nation with pretty terrible tanks. Gotta live with it or pick another nation. So overrated🤷♂️🤷♂️ my opinion from my experience.
I mean I was also a floor jet. However that blast radius will screw everyone over at least 4 or 5 times every 100 match’s or so. Additionally the amount of missiles being launched when it came out wiped out teams before they even got to range.
2 Likes
From my own experience, I mean Abrams isn’t tier-one level MBT on top tier, but it’s also not that bad as someone claimed. I have similar kd/kr on abrams, a6 and 99a, less better than a7v, bvm, maybe located at tie-two level, way better than t72b3, vt4a1 and Ariete.