Any justification for this ? Xm has termal, is much more mobile, has armour, better round just how ikv can be same br??
2 Likes
armor is paper on both, but LKV is actually better since no armor is best armor = spalls less when dart hits)
Has better dart, scouting,
And afterall, Those XM1, in 9.0 is xbox only and quite rare to see. Usually that Lkv is a lot bigger threat compared to XM1’s
1 Like
Do we play same game ? You can shred IKV by 50.cal, ikv have worse dart, and its slower, and because something is rare doesn’t justified undertier, otherwise is pay to win.
4 Likes
slpprj m/80 is vastly better than M735, in pen and post damage. Why it went up so much I don’t truly understand either, but i bet that the IKV players are far more effective than the average XM1
1 Like
The real question should be why is IKV 9.0 while the Object 685 is still 8.7.
I notice this too, its for sure better than 8.0 ikv, but not 9.0.
How tho? rounds are similar, reload is similar, mobility is similar. Both get scouting. What am I missing?
Quite a lot better dart actually on Ikv
Scouting is huge bonus.
Yes, it’s light you can 50cal it on side, but when you shoot dart on it, Ikv is more likely to survive compared on baby abrams, since it spalls so much more.
Frontal turret, makes beekaboo lot better compared on abrams
1 Like
As an XM-1 owner I’ll have you know that it’s a glorified light tank with no scouting and a round that has been artificially gimped and still not corrected. It can’t be .50 cal’d to death but autocannons and main guns will kill it easily. Also, G1 thermals are NOT good.
Good, very good guys, TBH i creating those bit “clickbait” threads just to get some fresh opinions about vehicles, as most reddit posts are really outdated, like 1 or 2 years old. : )
2 Likes
It would be nice if we could adjust the contrast and intensity on thermals. That’s what make them so bad in game.