The vehicle meant to replace the Soviet era BMPs
Description
The Kurganets-25 is a Russian infantry fighting vehicle (IFV) designed to replace the aging BMP-2 and BMP-3 vehicles in the Russian Army. It is based on the Armata Universal Combat Platform, similar to the T-14 Armata tank and T-15 Armata heavy IFV. The Kurganets-25 features a modular design that allows for various configurations, including troop carrier, command vehicle, reconnaissance, and fire support roles.
Its primary armament typically consists of a 30mm autocannon coupled with a coaxial 7.62mm machine gun. Additionally, it can be equipped with anti-tank guided missiles for engaging armored targets at longer ranges. The vehicle provides enhanced protection through advanced composite armor, active protection systems, and the ability to operate in nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) environments.
The Kurganets-25 is designed to accommodate a crew of three and up to eight fully equipped infantry soldiers. It incorporates advanced technologies for battlefield awareness, communication, and survivability, making it a versatile and potent asset on the modern battlefield.
T-15 Armata
Truly a HIFV (Heavy Infantry Fighting Vehicle)
Description
As of my last update in January 2022, there isn’t a widely recognized variant of the T-15 Armata equipped with a 57mm cannon. The standard armament for the T-15 Armata is a remotely controlled turret with a 30mm autocannon. However, it’s possible that developments or modifications have occurred since then. If there’s a newer variant with a 57mm cannon, it would likely provide increased firepower and versatility, potentially enhancing its capabilities against various threats on the battlefield. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, it’s recommended to consult recent sources or official announcements from relevant defense agencies or manufacturers.
Yes and no… the TOW is infinitely more useful in the long range maps, especially since you get more than 4 of them. Raketen 2 HOT is much much better than a Marder in a long range map.
IT-1 can fire oncthe move and has a stabilized sight, but it’s the outlier.
IFVs pretty much only win in the braindead CQC maps like Sweden.
This wasn’t always the case. Before the TOW nerf, I would have easily taken the M113 TOW over a BMP-1 any day. Of course, even back then - people were uneducated and idiotic as usual so they don’t really comprehend how the TOW launcher is meant to be played.
Today, after the various missile tracking nerfs - the M113 TOW is utterly useless. But the high BR has stayed because Gaijin is extremely slow to respond to their own changes. BR changes come very slowly and it can take years for a vehicle to be put at a BR it deserves, sometimes never.
It’s manufactured by Kazakhstan Paramount Engineering so it’ll be an event vehicle for the USSR and possibly other variants of the Mbombe for Britain, the Barys is a localized variant so it doesn’t belong to South Africa.
Ill say it because some people are afraid to say it but the bmp 3/bmd 4 are under br’d alongside the 2s38 and the bmp 2m. Ive played almost all ifvs around that br and im tired of people thinking they are fine where they are. The bmp3/4 are easy 9.3-9.7 but i disagree with them being the same br as the type 89 ,type 87 rcv, vbc pt2, and cv9030.
not so sure about the BMP-2M, besides the fact that the fuel tank sometimes eats shells and takes 0 damage, never really considered it a threat in my matches as the missiles are kinda meh
Or maybe i’ve just gotten really lucky with it
