Ahh, the old ONE SHOT Yak9! Impossible accuracy, never a shell waste and it’s Russian…funny that! In fact IL2, IL8 both Russian AND never miss, nothing like watching the REAL archive footage of chasing the shells/bullets into the target. Is there a theme here I wonder? Where IS the realism?
1 Like
And then there’s TIS MA and that other attacker with several 45mm. Of course behind paywall because ROFL, please suffer, freeloader. TIS MA is still fairly maneuvrable, but at least a tiny bit easier to hit and can’t loop all day long so there’s that.
Scenarios where a knife is more fitting than a firearm (a la a covert raid reliant on surprise, stealth, etc) are far more sensible than anything related to this absurdist banana talk.
That knife analogy has really proven itself lousy with all this straying into the weeds.
I never said anything on that topic, so you cannot contest anything about my logic on that.
The only thing even remotely related is that this knife analogy was a goofy, imperfect premise to start from.
Actually, what I said simply demonstrates a fuller understanding of the matter, not anything ‘made up.’
While you (incorrectly) presume a knife will always be an option of last resort or a choice made of desperation, I have disproved that by citing a counterexample (operations focused on stealth) that discredits that. Close quarters are another area where the knife is a preferred choice…nevermind your utility angle.
-
The knife analogy was not something I started
-
SPAAs are not ‘only’ spawned because of low SP
Without specifying the exact model and situation, this statement is too vague to really judge in any serious way.
Conditions and context matter as well as individuals’ preferences and skill levels varying. All of that matters to such calls.
All of that is–charitably–your opinion.
If I was being generous, I’d say your characterization paints the involved dynamics far too broadly. If I was being harsh, I’d say it’s too vague to be meaningful at all (you’d have to specific more things like BR range to even start pinning things down).
The reality of SPAA versus aircraft comparisons is that there are a ton of variations in how they interact with their surroundings and peers. Your latter statement in particular can be proven very untrue.
For instance: something like the L-62 can go on a slaughter at 3.X (and even higher, the 40mm shells bite) whereas many fighter aircraft of that range are clean (7mm MGs are still common and not all larger caliber weapons have decent pen) which leave them no serious means at attacking a whole set of enemies (such as armored vehicles)) and here player skill does not affect penetration values or loadout capabilities.
I own the TIS MA and will express my dubiousness about its maneuverability…for its size, I have my doubts.
As for the ‘paywall’ bit, that is not technically true–it was a vehicle obtained through an event originally. Now it is subject to the GJN Marketplace and all that comes with that.
While I understand your complaint and will freely tell you the game and its mechanics being what they are enhance accuracy for all, realism isn’t really as sturdy a ground to complain upon as you might think.
Few tanks during the war had third-person POV controls but that control method is standard here in spite of its ‘realistic liberty’ as you might call it.
That’s pure fantasy on the same level as banana talk. Except people actually die to banana allergy way more often than soldiers use knives “for stealth”.
Your “example” is 100% made up from modern perspective. maybe during WW2 where people had super lousy flashlights or none, hearing loss and bolt action rifles and still it only happened to a few soldiers in a war where 20 milion soldiers died.
Close quarters is where rifle and pistol beat knife every time.
That’s why every house and trench clearing operation is done with rifles and grenades and on a super-rare ocasion pistol is used. Yeah, that’s because you can’t shoot somebody point blank…
…oh wait.
That’s a fact hence I score a ton of SPAA kills even in Fw 190 F8. It’s small so they can’t hit me. I hit them just fine from 900-1000m away using stealth belts.
And I’m a horrible shot vs ground targets.
SPAA is plane fodder. Some are good as tank destroyers, though and these are indeed fun.
Every event vehicle nowadays is behind a paywall, unless someone has extreme amounts of time to grind. Haven’t managed to grind anything other than BP vehicles since like 2015.
And remember, Il-2 is like what, 3.0. it can roflstomp tanks from 1200m away with these 23mm cannons. You can down it with SPAA if he doesn’t see you first. And that’s a big if.
7,62mm armed planes are not a norm beyond 2.3BR. wuite the contrary.
1 Like
I’ve grown bored with the knife analogy, so I spoilered that portion for brevity…
Spoiler
I’m not sure why you believe knives are not in use…the only thing made-up here is this ‘100%’ talk, as that sort of absolutism is plainly unrealistic.
You are referring to larger groups clearing things where the risks of taking long guns into close quarters fights is reduced by the others’ ability to offer mutual protection. In a situation with fewer people (especially one) and such mutual protection doesn’t exist, the idea of relying upon a firearm (especially a long gun) is riskier and a knife may be preferable due to the ranges involved.
All that this back and forth is proving is the faults of the original knife analogy…it was always imperfect.
Considering that many SPAAs have closed tops roofs (T77E1/Coelian) or nearly so (Wirbelwind/Ostwinds), calling these things as ‘fodder’ remains your opinion and I’d argue it’s a stretch at that.
I don’t think of even my more open Dusters as ‘fodder’ (as I see it, that’s just defeatist thinking and encourages losses) despite their greater vulnerability to gunfire.
I cannot say I agree even though my time is limited by a typical work week and other obligations.
Spoiler
I haven’t had any problems with most of the events (such as the T-34-85 Partisan one that just finished) or the Warbond/Battle Pass ones. Even with a full schedule when I’ve decided to pursue them, I’d say they only take ~2-4 hrs/day for the 35k points task events, depending on how things go.
Generally speaking, many of the events can be knocked over as long as you have a strategy on how to do them in an efficient manner. (I say ‘many’ and not ‘most’ because while liked the crafting events’ basic concept…but not their concept or timings).
Given the problems associated with gun convergence at 1200m, that seems like a lofty figure. 800m is the highest setting and at 1200mm you’ll have to do some fancy aiming to place your shots…it’s certainly not optimized at that range.
I know I’ve also gunned down many IL-2s inside that range, even when being fired upon and also wounded too. Being attacked doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll be killed (repairs being what they are for GFs also favor the SPAAs).
While other weapons like the 20mm cannons of things such as the A6Ms or Bf 109s are around by 3.X to support the 7mm MGs, those cannons often also lack anti-armor ability.
That’s a lie.
Firearms are superior at every distance other than hugging distance.
IRL you can’t respawn. Literally nobody is walking around with knife drawn if he has ammo for his rifle or has a pistol. Why? Because knife puts you in immediate disadvantage vs anyone who is armed with any other nob-improvised weapon. During WW1 trench raids people used clubs and shovels. Why? Because these consistently beat knives too. But clubs and shovels were vastly inferior to pistols, shotguns and SMGs.
Stop.living your teenage ninja power fantasy, kid.
Wirbel is as “nearly” to closed top as knife is to an effective modern weapon. Wirbel is getting roflstomped by .303 MGs because not only it has open top but also holes in armor around the guns.
Coelian is not available so discussing it makes no sende. Kugel fights jets, so it’s not useful in any lineup. So there we go, that’s all “closed top” German vehicles for you. Probably same applies to Italy, Japan, Sweden (outside of that one cold war vehicle cosplaying as early war, it can withstand some German guns) damn, maybe even Soviets.
Brits and US have some armored vehicles, that’s true. IL-2 still goes through, but yeah, a lot of planes can’t. But they are generally relatively easy to dodge and outside of .50 cal armed one they have bad range.
Too bad many nationd don’t have anywhere close to that level of comfort (which is still damn low) And too bad these SPAAs have horrible chances to score any ground kills.
What I said isn’t a lie–it’s correct. When you have mutual protection, you don’t have to worry about someone at close range getting the drop on you because you couldn’t get the firearm (especially long guns) on them at that distance.
Even if we take your claim of ‘superiority’ as correct, that wouldn’t discount the sufficiency of another weapon (a la a knife) to be effective too.
I had to laugh this–it was good humor. Putting aside the likelihood that I’m probably old enough to be your big brother, that I’m being less absolutist and more realistic about how variable reality plays out is not a fantasy–it’s realism. As I’ve said many times…conditions vary.
There’s a reason guys going in to confront folks with ‘inferior’ weaponry don’t rush in because they have ‘superior’ weaponry. If the weaponry connects, it’ll hurt.
“Superiority” won’t mean much when “sufficient” will do the job. That’s true in reality and in WT.
The Wirbelwind and Ostwind have fairly hefty armoring, especially compared to others. While it is possible to spray them and hope for some hits neutralizing its turret crew, that makes you a stationary target to the same…which doesn’t make it a very enticing prospect to try. It’s a risky gamble with anyone who isn’t asleep.
As I have the Coelian and enjoyed it, I cannot say I share your dismissal of it nor that the Kugelblitz’ situation makes it inherently unsuitable for use (though I will acknowledge I have yet to try it for myself).
Talking about “many cases” where certain weapon is practically never used. Discussing “superiority” when certain weapon is never CHOSEN.
A lot of children and man-childs dream this power fantasy of defeating guns in melee. You know, space marines and stuff. If you are like 40 years old, then it’s just super sad. Play some computer games and stop mistaking them for reality.
Banana peels and banana allergy have killed plenty of people. So I guess they have “many” cases where they are superior to firearms. Also silent and 100% biodegradable.
Wirbel and Ost both have virtually no armorinf vs planes. Vs tank MGs they will protect you at long range cause at short range your crewmen will die through the gaps in armor.
There’s no gamble, they are an easy kill.
Kugel at 6.7 was OK, at 7.0 it’s useless. It’s higher ROF, waaaay less range alternative to Coelian. 58mm pen is not a lot and HVAP is of very limited use and you have 1 in like 4? Used to have 93 pen, but that was too much and Gaijin nerfed it just enough so it xan’t hurt soviet mediums and heavies at that BR.
If you don’t understand the potency of a weapon because you’re blinded by this “superiority” take…that’s unfortunate, especially given that you imply I have hyped knives when I have not.
What I have said on these matters has been realistic and serious…moderate really. I haven’t tried to say anything was always or never the case, I just acknowledged the possibilities involved.
Believing that a ‘superior’ weapon is always preferable or that an 'inferior" weapon is never sufficient is mistaken, as reality has proven many times.
As a side note: absolute terms like ‘always’ and ‘never’ are very poor words to select in discussions because even one single counterexample destroys the claim–as I showcased earlier. Broader, more open terminology is almost always more realistic.
All in all, the whole knife analogy has proven to be a bizarre yet fascinating tangent. It’s a far cry from where things started.
SPAAs shouldn’t be counted out…that’s really all there is to say in sum-up.
You are still doing this. It all started with “many situations”, and “,close quarters superiority” while one is false in the “many” part while the other is an absolute made up power fantasy.
Just talk to some soldiers maybe.
Moderate approach is: knife is no longer truely a weapon and should be considered a tool and indeed in many armies it’s designed accordingly.
Comparing SPAA to a knife is simply openly stating that SPAA is a last ditch effort that will result in an almost guaranteed failure unless facing another SPAA. I don’t agree but I respect such view, as the game clearly shows that overwhelming majority of SPAA are just free kills.
Show me those cases of someone choosing a knife in a modern conflict over f.e. a pistol.
Oh, yes, for spreading butter on a bread.
Pistol is not good. Also for cutting sausage I definitely choose a knife.
It’s all about probability. What will work. A banana? Or a knife? What is more useful in close quarter combat Nutrition provided by banana. Or added movement speed provided by knife, because life is like counter strike, oh wait, it isn’t. Banana provides nutrition and deadly banana peel (and also can work vs enemies allergic to bananas) and knife-wielding power-fantasy kiddo will provide target practice for properly armed opponents.
So overal - banana seems to be superior. Potassium is very important.
Of course soldiers carry a knife because they need a cutting tool. If they did not, they would carry a banana.
SPAA is slightly superior in this regard. With masterful performance it can beat avg plane user. But that’s it. If our SPAA master faced equally skilled plane user, he would eat RP-3 from 1300m away.
I’ve acknowledged the possibilities…but I have no interest in bothering with the knife bit further.
In a rather fitting twist, I can tell you I debuted the T77E1 hours ago on Finland and I thoroughly enjoyed what it offered.
I believe I took out 2 or 3 aircraft plus a stray Wirbelwind…despite the utterly stock vehicle and new status, I felt pretty comfy with the T77. The only glaring flaw I personally found in it was (is) its Tier II rank.
To close things up for the time being, I thing it’s fair to say you and I have very divergent views on these matters.
T77 barely gets better with upgrades.
Meanwhile after scoring 1 assist I can take out 3 heavy tanks using a Wyvern and gun down some light vehicles like basically every single German tank around that BR :P
T77 is good as long as nobody is willing to waste a bomb on him. I sometimes do, when I have no better targets and also from long range it looks like Sherman so there’s that. I always feel sad I wasted a bomb on a useless vehicle :P
Wait what?
The “roof armor” of T77E1 and the side shields of whirbelwinds/Ostwinds will NOT stop CAS strafing down on them. The planes have the mgs and cannons to wreck all of the above easily.
And your earlier comment about killing Tiger IIs with an M42… a wee bit exaggerated maybe?
Considering the weakest armor the m42 can target is 80mm (often sloped) and the m42 max pen at point blank range is 72mm, I don’t see how you are “killing them”. At best you are tracking them or maybe disabling their gun.
2 Likes
For anybody else reading this ESPECIALLY those that think the recoil of Yak9’s centreline cannon DOES NOT affect the accuracy let me explain. Correct, the airspeed is slowed down and also with every succesive shot. Reduced airspeed mean reduced AIRFLOW over CONTROL SURFACES. Putting the engine torque aside, reduced airflow over control surfaces will result in yaw, roll and nose attitude, so unless the pilot is a CAT…I rest my case. The Yak9 was originally a bomber interceptor where accuracy was of little importance against mass bomber formations where one shell/one plane had a good chance. The bombers in question being B17, B29 and B24. Gaijin got this correct in Birds of Prey/Steel so why not with this game. Dumbing down perhaps.
The T77 is enclosed, minus its bubbles. The other two are open but would have to be hit by steep firing strafing runs which turn the incoming enemy into a stationary target, which makes him easier to hit.
I just began using the T77, so the jury is out–but on the latter two, it’s not uncommon to trick enemy players into trying an attack by pretending to not seeing them…then blasting them.
Not exaggerated in the slightest: my best result was two Tiger II Hs killed side by side along with a Jpz 4-5 and another vehicle (a Panther or Jagdpanther if I recall) around the same time.
The Tiger IIs were killed by sneaking behind them and firing through their turret rings (40mm thick or something); the JPz 4/5 is generally soft and the Panther/Jagdpanther would have been killed by side shots.
It wasn’t unusual to get 1 or 2 guys like that (the M42 was 6.7 at the time, so this was its standard MM)–but I was fortunate enough to find a gang of rather dim Germans on Hurtgen Forest that day (circa 2018 I’d say). I got onto the flank, circled around them and then struck.
Swing role use by the M19/M42 is still common for me.
12mm AP from above will pen anything on the TE77 but the glacis. Would not last if targeted by CAS. And that’s just mgs. Ground attack planes with anything stronger would not sweat taking it out.
The side armor will only help the other two if a plane comes in at a ridiculously low angle - and any auto-cannons would still punch through. They are open topped and totally vulnerable to any and all CAS attacks.
As for the Tiger 2 kill one-offs you claim, well I can’t prove you didn’t do it.
But good luck for anyone relying on that. And apparently you have not replicated it in 7 years.
Using examples of one-in-a-million lightning strikes doesn’t really support your narrative.
1 Like
Having survived many strafing attacks, I cannot say any and all will kill them. Wound? Certainly possible. Kill? Not necessarily, given the two hull crew.
In the meantime, the attacking aircraft is effectively a stationary target for the SPAA to fire upon and it doesn’t have crew replacement or crew changing seats to fall back upon. If someone is looking for an ‘easy’ setup for SPAAs, letting the aircraft come right at you is one way to do it. (Sometimes I intentionally fire at aircraft to entice this.)
It happened and people at the time were freely able to watch the server replay. If you want to look at the damage viewers in game now, you can see that the ammunition of the Dusters will go through the turret rings from behind (as was the case then).
As for replicating it…the M42 isn’t at 6.7 now, is spaded and I haven’t really bothered trying to do it as of late (some time ago (read: months), I did goof around with the 75mm M3 GMC at 6.X though…that generated some laughs). I could probably go on a rampage with the M42 at that range if I wanted to, as nothing has really changed mechanically since then…I just don’t have any real need to do so.
I’m not sure how you read what I said as that–both because the odds are higher than that and because I said they occurred because I intended the encounters to happen. I didn’t just accidentally kill those Tigers, I went out to go after them because I was bored waiting on aircraft.
Then do it again.
1 Like
If I get around to it, sure.
Looking at the X ray viewer in game, it seems they’ve changed the modeling in the years since (possibly due to volumetric). It’s still possible to wound the Tiger IIs with the 40mm now via the turret ring–but it’s clearly trickier than it used to be.
Oh, so pre-volumetric. That explains it.
1 Like