If the Bradley is at BR 9.7, then the Dardo and VCC-80/30 must also decrease in BR

Once again, the game balance makes no sense. More powerful vehicles are kept at lower BR than less powerful vehicles.

If you lower the BR of the Bradley, you should also lower the BR of the Dardo and the VCC-80/30, which are literally the same thing, only slightly inferior to the Bradley, since, unlike the Bradley, the Dardo and the VCC-80/30 cannot lock onto aerial targets and create a smoke cloud from the engine, which gives the Bradley a tactical advantage.

Once again Gaijin, you have shown that you have no idea how to balance your game properly. The only thing that seems to matter to you is the malice you actively demonstrate in paralysing the Italian nation, making it unplayable.

4 Likes

Yep looks like it.

Correction, Bradley should be higher.

If the Type 24/25 ICV (P) and RCV (P) are 9.7 these don’t need to be the same BR, in fact, if they moved the CWTV’s down to 9.3 it would make sense for all these to go down to 9.7, but as of right now anything with a TOW shouldn’t be the same BR as something with only the main gun.

American teams need all the handholding they can get with more under-BR’d vehicles. ;)

So why did the Desert Warrior also move down?

2 Likes

You forgot to mention that the Dardo’s gun has almost 3x the firerate of the Bradleys gun, with the vehicle also being significantly faster

The Dardo should be a higher BR, but the Bradley and Desert Warrior should be 9.3, with the Dardo at 9.7

3 Likes

Pity? IDK, but there’s an analysis that you can get that ends up putting the Dardo line of vehicles as superior to at least M3A3.

Whether I’d personally endorse a different BR for them? I don’t know, probably not.

I do know the Bradley’s not the most mobile of the IFVs.

You’ll never guess the answer…

And you forgot that the Dardo doesn’t have the same penetration as the Bradley’s 30mm cannon…

So, honestly, it should have the same BR

Wow, a whole 9mm of pen, that’s totally worth it to lose almost 2/3 the fire rate

The Desert Warrior has that same dart, with the worse pen, and sits at 9.7 where you want the Dardo to be while having worse firerate, armour and speed

1 Like

Dardo has a vastly superior rate of fire to make for that and it’s launchers are always deployed, can’t make a judgement about speed

but I very much doubt the Bradley is better than either in any way other than commander sight memes




Gaijin does balance changes based on stats. Bradley was performing worse than the the two Italian IFVs in January.

This only demonstrates that American players are not capable of playing this game, but if you evaluate the characteristics of the vehicle, it is obvious that they should have the same BR.

The vehicle characteristics indicate they should not be the same BR, you just seem very stubborn about denying this

2 Likes

Here, the only stubborn one is you, who needs a crutch to win.

what

Yes Americans could be why the stats are lower, the only differences I see is more armor on Dardo and not haveing to wait for the Tow launcher to deploy. The bradley’s advantage of engine smoke and air track are useful but I’m not sure if its the same weight as the advantages Dardo has.

It’s a shame that Dardo is at BR 10.0…

Desert Warrior and Dardo have the same 25mm cannon, so they should both be at BR 9.7. It’s simple logic.

They do not have the same gun, what are you talking about

They have the same dart.

The Dardo has 560 rpm

The D.Warrior only has 200 rpm

2 Likes

hmmm

2 Likes