yet there are evidence that what type of shell a tank would allows to be used is a factor of balancing
how is this not a artificial nerf made to mantain banlance in the game?
besides, what on earth do you define defending?
yet there are evidence that what type of shell a tank would allows to be used is a factor of balancing
how is this not a artificial nerf made to mantain banlance in the game?
besides, what on earth do you define defending?
Prove that amount of rounds on tanks is limited purely based on feeling; I’ll wait.
sry what? where did you get that from
You make the demand that Gaijin should artificially limit store positions.
The tank comparison would be artificially limited AMOUNT of rounds, nothing else.
you can’t simply swap concepts
I was only proving that artificial nerfs existed already and nothing else
You didn’t prove there are artificial nerfs. All you’ve done is prove there are none.
Further proof of no artificial nerfs.
Weapon selection isn’t a nerf or buff because of the BR system.
Weapon selection =/= artificially nerfing the amount of weapons on a vehicle.
I would not develop this further unless a define of artificial has made
Check Webster’s English dictionary.
may you roll your mouse upward and check my previous post?
which part of the dictionary you disagreed with?