Idea's for new US tank BR (Reworked)

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
32

Thank you for the people who suggested new things!
Im working on adding new SPAA rn.

33

There is a suggestion for this stryker, its good and detailed, i hope it will help

1 Like
34

Thank you i’m going to be adding details to all the new stuff and things im changing so this helps out a lot.

35

RN im adding extra information about some of the newer tanks please add threads or websites if you have any to help!

36

Do you have any threads like this for the MIM-46, MIM-HAWK and MIM-104

37

There is one for the MIM-46
MIM-46 Mauler - Suggestions / Ground - War Thunder — official forum
The MIM-23 Hawk and MIM-104 Patriot can’t function without its separate radar piece, hence why people are likely waiting until Gaijin allows for multi-system SAMs to suggest them.

If you weren’t aware, all suggestions for U.S. ground vehicles can be found here:
List of Previously Suggested Ideas - USA Ground Forces - Suggestions / Ground - War Thunder — official forum

1 Like
38

Thank you I wasn’t aware of that, this is going to make my life a lot easier.

1 Like
39

No problem, and for good measure here are the suggestions from the old forum as well:
List of Previously Suggested Ideas - US Ground Forces (Please Check Before Creating A New Suggestion!) - USA - War Thunder - Official Forum

1 Like
40

Ill defiantly check there too. When im done C&P all the info and giving credit I’m going to link a model of the TT in here so everyone can click on things to learn about them and have a reason for the BR

1 Like
41

I put in what I could find sadly it wasn’t all of them
Here is the link
https://przemyslaw-zan.github.io/WT-Tech-Tree-Maker/

42

I have two things

A. Isn’t the Stryker SHORAD an SPAA? why is it after the MGS one?

and B.

You’re aware that suggestion is under the UK suggestions right? And not the US.

Otherwise good work, I think. Don’t exactly care about post-WW2 US things most of the time

1 Like
43

I was conflicted between line 4 and 5. On one hand yes it can carry stingers and on the other it can carry hellfire’s. I decided to put it there because it felt more right there. However if enough people want it changed ill happily change it

1 Like
44

Yes however it is on a M60 hull. Again if enough people disagree ill remove it. Thank you for helping out.

Also it’s kinda like the skink debate

45

I see. I just see it under SPAA most of the time it’s brought up, hence why I was confused.

I just figured I’d bring it up as suggestions rules are the only guidelines we have for placement, meaning the sections it’s under are likely the more likely tree it’ll be added under if it came to the game. Tho I don’t think there’ll be many disagreements, after all, US mains couldn’t take not getting an SPAA the US outright rejected because its hull originated as a US design(and ended up getting because of crying about that, it’s why I think the “it uses X hull/parts” is dumb. But it’s not me making this but you)

1 Like
46

This is a very very good point, i’ll look into a replacement RN. Thank you for brining this to my attention.

I might be making it but it’s not for myself it’s for the player base. If something isn’t right i’ll be ready to change it.

1 Like
47

One more thing im struggling to find that one guys mega list for spaa would you happen to know where I could find that?

48

Nevermind I found it.

49

I finished the air BRs if yall wanna check those out =)

Here

50

I am curious, did you think of moving the XM8 and/or CCVL to the research tree? I haven’t played past 8.3 US but looking at it it looks like those are two good vehicles that could help with the light tank gaps. I know they are market vehicles but maybe they could be moved? Looks really good and I think this is something we need to have happen.

1 Like
51

I’ll look into it. Thanks for the suggestion!