IAF Su-30MKI - Missile bus with lot's of different weapons

But people cite propaganda saying it is stealth (especially Growling Sidewinder but he does it so his comment section isn’t filled with cope bots) when it is just low observability

what are you saying

I mean the Su 57, I also forgot to include the part I was responding to

this part
I also mean it is pointless as the Su 34/35 with RAM will make the Felon pointless

Su-35 already has ram and is being shot down anyways.
Su-57 is magnitudes better than any flanker in terms of rcs, it should be pretty comparable to f-35 front aspect with the irst ball closed.
I don’t think stuff like the su30mki has ram coating as it would be essentially useless….

1 Like

You poor, poor creature

What actual points are there which proves otherwise?

Literally does the opposite…

Continue this in :-

3 Likes

some system of new radar for the 30mki

2 Likes

Seen with BrahMos

2 Likes

Those training missiles have seen better days

2 Likes

Wait India has SCALP-EGs?

Ye

image

image

1 Like

Imagine if they integrate it on the Su-30MKI like the MICA lol

Kh-38MT/ML’s have been added to it’s weaponry due to the Su-30MK being advertised with them, and ofc the MKM having them ingame :)

5 Likes

Ye and MK=/=MKM, base model was shown as possible airframe for new family of missile.Although they are quite different so the argument is even more irrelevant.

1 Like

Once again, the missile was advertised with it (“it” being the MK)

So far there has been zero proof saying it cannot use them, hence they are valid to be added here.

If the MKM can get it, the MKI can too (especially considering the fact it got multiple upgrades over time)

I have only seen words with no supportive proof saying this, and it still continues

3 Likes

This plane shall come under Israel TT too.

cope & Seeth

4 Likes

best british cas incoming!

MK with different weapon system, radar, etc.

And there has been zero proof saying it can use it lol. Why would they integrated them if Malaysia didn’t bought them?

So you basicaly have nothing to proof it, as expected