They want to help the British tree and they consider that India does that job well. I don’t really agree with them and I think Canada and Australia do a better job, but what can we do
Canadian and australian vehicles are entirely copy paste unlike indian vehicles that have unique variants and weaponry, also gaijin evidently favours canada/australia over india for uk like they add 1 indian vehicle a year
4 Likes
Absolutely false, you don’t need to put down nations to glaze another
Australia and Canada don’t even have a dedicated host tree, they’re doomed to be split across trees. India sure is in a bad state but at least it’s all in a single nation
3 Likes
I thought Australia was now a firm part of the UK tree (at the very least every current Australian vehicle is available in the UK tree)
Australia is a sub tt of UK
2 Likes
Yeah my bad I forgot they changed the status of Australia. Still though Canada has no home and is scattered across 3 different tech tree which is sorta problematic. And let’s also not forget how most of its vehicles are unobtainium to this day, while it has a lot more than India
2 Likes
True, Canada’s treatment is tragic and I’m hoping Singapore can avoid going down the same road.
2 Likes
+1 hope to see the legendary rivals face off in game!
3 Likes
only as canadairs stuff has appeared in other trees as export vehicles.
can say most of us brit mains also favour the canadian and australian stuff over the indian additions too. We dont want soviet copypaste, we would (and many of us do) play ussr for that
3 Likes
It is entirely untrue.
Even if we exclude naval vehicles
Australia had Wirraway, Boomerang brothers, and Sentinel
While Canada has QF 3.7 Ram, Ram I, and Skink(gone C&P into American tech tree)
I am trying to agree with it, but eeeh, that Osa and Strella were direct C&P of soviet counterparts.
No, no, Gaijin does not favours canada/austrilia over india for uk.
Gaijin favours vehicles that are ‘easier to be added’
Look at South Africa, another dedicated sub-tree nation of UK TT since Ixwa Strike, but has only one aeroplane (JAS39C SAAF) since their introduction.
Just like India, South Africa also had a modified Mirage fleet with unique weaponry, but Gaijin has neglected those for years.
4 Likes
A huge no, obviously because it completely ruins the top tier of France’s Air being unique, but also because France doesn’t have something for top tier that’s entirely export blocked like F-22, nor anything exported as little as the Su-57, which means that, out of the top 3 largest arms exports, France is the only one with nothing else to add to keep it unique, that’s literally apart of the benefit to purchasing French equipment. Not only does the UK have absolutely heaps of options as is, not only did the UK have a jet competing against Rafale in the same project, not only is the reception to India going to UK heavily debatable, but India also purchased a lot from France as is, which gives a pretty poor sentiment for UK’s third subtree. Overall this is a no, and only goes down to a ‘maybe’ for the pre-F.4-Era Rafale EH once there’s something like Rafale F5, but even that’s unlikely as India and France are very close in this industry, even going so far as India looking into France’s 6th gen programs
Unfortunately they’re definitely gonna copypaste the Rafale to at least Japan and Israel, having it in Britain on top of that won’t change much. Just be glad France will still be the country that gets all the Rafales
Why should I be glad? I won’t be glad for stupidity
Because in life if you don’t want to be fcking depressed you have to see the good in everything. I’m pointing out that it’s not as bad as it could be
Doesn’t mean I should settle for it. “Go ahead, do something I dislike, I’ll be glad about it” is such a bad mentality. If I think a decision is bad, I’ll speak about it. Not let some other losers make the choice for me.
Unless you can get, like, the entire French community to complain loudly, then nothing will happen as the devs are very stubborn. But you can try, every mass action must start with one
Well duh, that’s the plan, to be the voice against it, rather than what some people want, which is to sit, say nothing, and be glad
What’s so bad about it anyway? France will still have Rafales, and making more nations have them might make more stuff done for it
2 Likes
I explained the issues before? Did you bother to check out why it’s an issue?