You forgot the Oplot for China, so they have four.
I generally don’t count squadron vehicles, especially bad ones like the Oplot.
Purely talking about TT vehicles.
Then the M1A1 Aim is Squadron and 2A4M is a pack vehicle. So neither counts and they should be added since GB still only has 2 vehicles at top tier.
India and South Africa are confirmed sub trees for Britain, meanwhile Australia and Canada are not. And the Arjun was already teased to be coming.
I do think the Canadian and Australian aircraft they have added to the British tree have been good additions (besides Canada getting cucked a little), but Adding both the Canadian Leos and Australian Abrams to Britain top tier is not a good idea.
But India is an official Subtree for Britain, Australia and Canada or not. (Which makes no sense TBH). If Australia and Canada were official decleared to be a subtree for Britain, I woudn’t really mind them adding SepV3 and 2A6M in future. Adding them to GB would probably make grinding either US or Germany pointless (Maybe not US)
Yeah they don’t.
Absolutely not.
Also if Britain only has 2 top tier vehicles than the US also only has 1-2? since you don’t seem to count half the Chally 2s, I can also not count half the Abrams in the US tree.
British top tier is fine with their current tanks, they just need to be fixed a lot and have the actual Challenger 3 prototype added. No need to make top tier US and Germany borderline useless just to pander another random borderline skill issue British main.
I don’t think it would make Germany pointless. They still have the 2A7 currently, plus the 2A8 they need to add and the Leoclerc if they put it in Germeny.
Is Australia currently fielding the Sepv3?
I don’t think this is a good idea entirely. Commonwealth is 56 nations, over a quarter of the worlds recognized nations, which is something that is quite literally impossible to balance with other techtrees.
There’s also some commonwealth nations that already have fixed placements otherwise, like Pakistan with China, Malaysia with Japan, Cyprus with Israel and Singapore in the future confirmed to at least have some vehicles with Israel as well.
Instead I think commonwealth nations should still be sorted on a case by case basis, so that techtrees can still be roughly balanced to have similar amounts of total options to add.
1 Like
They have already been receiving them for a while now.
Cant, its already german
Cant, already in sweden
Cant, already german
cant, already US
Which can still be added to Sweden, 2A7V through Denmark and 2A8 through Norway and Sweden
And i kid you not, few player have asked for Qatari 2A7V to be added to Britian
I believe so
Commonwealth might have been a bad term to use their. India, Australia, and Canada all still have strong ties to the British military. Pakistan not so much.
1 Like
sayingit like it isnt already useless. M1A2T, Strv122, 2a7v and 2a5+2a6 scattered across the tech trees of minors say hello
Very technically they can.
Exactly the same tank.
However it’s more a case of should, especially with the top tier vehicles.
US is still very good to grind because multiple abrams >>> M1A2T
3 Likes
That hasn’t stopped them from being everywhere else. Sweden has a 10.7 with three Leopards and their top tier is four of the same leopard 2.
M1A2T is still a SEPV2, so still worth grinding US for now for SEPV3. Add SEPV3 to GB and the only reason to grind US is for F-22 and Stryker variants as everything else could probably given to other nation through some other nation
Yes, but that’s my point, the whole sub-tree system is flawed, why should 2 nations that fought for years to be independent of the British empire, one of which left the commonwealth for decades in outrage over their treatment as a colony be sub-trees to the UK while nations that still recognize the English monarch not be?
But even more than that why should I be prohibited from playing a line up of my nations vehicles just because I’m from a smaller Country? That is complete bull shit!
4 Likes
See the STRV 81 RB 52 as well.
2 of which are Swedish and 1 is Finnish.
I wouldn’t mind Britain having an Abrams and Leo 2 if they were actually British and served in the British army.
I agree that it’s flawed, but making both Australia and Canada sub trees will be flawed for entirely different reasons. Unless we go the route of “not every vehicle that is in service with a sub tree nation irl needs to be added”.
Thats actually a great example, tho seeing 2a4can being german, and c2a1 being german event vehicle, its hardly believed that britain getting tech tree c2a1 is something possible.
Still you get exactly same experience with M1A2T that you get with any top tier abrams. If they got m1 or m1a1 it would be different but not when its basically top top tier abrams.
Stopped. Neither got them in the first place.
exactly, they have 3 different nation`s leopards
which is two different nation leopards, yes
they have little difference ingame, so 12.7 abrams = 12.7 abrams, US is already obsolete as much as germany if you have no “special” view on chinese tech tree.
and first wouldnt require you to grind tanks, and strykers are just ass AND can be also added to japan as thai used them)))