Another TIGER_TANK_1 post…another bad take…they don’t need a buff, they need like 10 buffs
This actually sounds pretty cool.
I would like a buff that will replace pebbles with f111a with full 12000 kg bomb load. Or smoke shells barrage. Anything to annoy campers.
Gaijin said no in the latest Q&A

Why are you making RB topics if you don’t even play it?
lmao, people care more about the poster than the post. The same people who were against nerfing arty, and saying it should be buffed are now against buffing arty and saying it should be nerfed, all cuz Tiger said it should be buffed.
truth nuke
Well this must be the first post which I agree with Tiger_tank_1.
The 152mm HE artillery feels very weak in Top Tier battles, even some tanks surviving direct hits of the artillery (like BMPT or Merkava or some T-series that hits the ERA).
I always wanted some type of different and stronger type of artillery, like a short strike of a MLRS. Ofc limited only for light tanks and with a way longer cooldown, if not only 1 use per vehicle.
Pros:
- More munition impact over the target area with a longer spread.
- Munitions may do more damage than the default 152mm HE shells.
Cons:
- Longer cooldown if not only 1 use.
- Takes more time for the munition to arrive to the target zone.
- Because the rockets of the MLRS hit in a more diagonal way, it may be intercepted by buildings, instead of the vertical hit of regular arty.
Examples for MLRS artillery: Katyusha, Panzerwerfer, BM21, S-8 rocket carriers, etc.
Rb has arty go on cool down once used but you can use it regardless of kills/scouting
lmao these seriel turdposters should just be banned at this point
wow a TIGER_TANK_1 post I actually somewhat agree with
My onyl problem is when i hit T90M or BVM directly with Artillery it does nothing. But my Tanks will implode when it lands 30 yards away lol
Bc ERA its overperforming.
Oh yeah forsure. Ever since the BVM was added its been ridiculous