This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
“i think this tank is op but heres why its not”
??
8 Likes
Most coherent wt forum post.
It’s gotta be one of the worst, is the ammo rack blowing up the tracks fixed yet?
So you think it’s OP or underperforming??
Community consensus is that the Namer is underperforming in protection, survivability, SPIKES and the gun
1 Like
Both Namers could honestly move back to 10.7 and 11.0 respectively and there would be little to no issues.
They both seriously need more spikes to even be worth taking.
Same with the Vilkas, Puma VJTF, and the KF41.
4 Spikes is basically 4 aircraft (heli) kills, or maybe 1 or 2 MBT kills if you’re lucky 😅
2 Likes
And please give the 4 Spike carriers ammo boxes.
3 Likes
Yeah, besides fitting the lineup, there is no way in hell that the Namers are 11.3 material
2 Likes
actually true since 90% of the time i only put my turret up my ammo gets destroyed my elavtor is also destroyed my breech probably destroyed or its yellow and the launchers just repair it and its good
I really dont like the 30MM bushmaster 2 sure the APFSDS has 113 mm of penatration
True as well but the thing I really hate about the namer is the Spike ammo placement its obstructing the empty space
1 Like
thats what im saying sure it should go back to 11.0 or 10.3 as well
I agree then 👍
Please use already created thread in machinery of war section if you want to discuss this vehicle.
thank you,