Dude calls all Americans muppets for some reason.
Anyone that critique his precious Russian tanks are muppets to him.
1 Like
except they didn’t had leopards and dm53 at that time
If im not wrong
that was supposed to be an (whatever the russan name is) 42 or 46 its from a while back so i dont remember exactly wich one
1 Like
It was 42M or something like that.
46 replaced that, then it wasn’t enough cause DM53 was and still is a lolpen round, so 3BM60 came shortly after and only BVM got the BR cause of its hull armor improvement & speed, while getting a rather massive “nerf” to turret armor.
1 Like
Not sure whats funnier
Ppl blindly assuming APFSDS took out that BVM or that reddit censored his AK
They only switched for tax benefits and to avoid Russian sanctions.
3 Likes
That’s not why. There were no threats of sanctions when they moved to Hungary.
Actually it was 2015 - after Russia invaded Ukraine so political situation could be a factor.
2015 was their first major expansion of employees, and setting up shop where almost all their future employees will live [EU] is smart for logistics as they planned to continue development indefinitely.
Make sense! Could absolutely be one of the reasons.
You’re wrong
Is it proven that the tank was actually penetrated there?
how ? i mean there is what 30mm armor + spall liner…
Is that some russia suffers patch or smt ?
no
1 Like
it s only for nato vehicles, whe nyou do it to russian vehicles, theres not even half the spall.
1 Like
Use your brain, Russians can only get a good experience with the T80BVM tank. The T72 and T90 are rundown tanks with worse maneuverability than the challenger, while Sweden should be the most boycotted. They have three 122s and one Leopard 2A6 at the same time，Excluding unstable factors in game code, you will find that killing Russian tanks is much easier than killing NATO tanks
1 Like
Thank you for this
I like the name of this post.
It’s really more proof for me that the Developers have very little knowledge about the capabilities of vehicles and how they should perform.
But it’s no wonder. WT has been out for more than 10 years, started with planes but not to this day they were able to implement any realistic performance of aircraft ammunition.
Of course there’s always some Bias, even from the playerbase.
Because if we don’t know something, we just make it up how we think it should be.
And if the majority of Italian fighter is armed with just two 12.7mm MGs, then those explosive rounds better make the gun perform much better then without 😂
It’s understandable that the developers might lack some understanding of the mechanics they want to implement since you’d really need to spent a lot of time learning all about how things actually work in RL.
Of course there’s now already a foundation of a lot of things that are not really how they should be.
Like that shells can still randomly ricochet or aircraft fuel fires that are simply based on RNG.
2 Likes