Hunting BL.755: Fury from Above

[Would you like to see this in-game?]
  • Yes
  • No

0 voters

Introduction: The BL.755 family represented the main anti-armour weapon used by the RAF for the better part of four decades. This weapon would make a great addition to the game, and the fact it is not in game is sorely being felt by British aircraft.

Background: From it’s formation in 1948, to about 1961, NATO’s main response against a Soviet invasion would have been the immediate use of nuclear force. However, the Berlin Standoff in 1961 showed how precarious this situation was, and how a minor situation could quickly escalate into full-blown nuclear conflict. To avoid this, a new response system called Flexible Response was implemented, in which conventional forces were to be used to stave off any invasion, with nuclear force only being used if deemed absolutely necessary. To do this, conventional weapons such as bombs and rockets were to be used. In the RAF’s case, their main anti-armour weapon at this time was the SNEB. This weapon allowed for the carriage of numerous weapons in an aerodynamic pod. However, by the late-Sixties, the Air Staff came to the conclusion that a new weapon was needed, as by now the SNEB was deemed unsuitable for use against tanks, due to the aircraft having to stay within the engagement zone for a long period, leaving it vulnerable to AA fire, as well as the system offering low chances of destruction against newer vehicles. A new weapon was sought for this role. A cluster bomb was chosen, thus beginning the BL.755 story.


BL.755: The BL.755 was designed with the express purpose of taking on Soviet armour formations. Each bomb was divided into seven compartments that carried 147 submunitions in total. Each submunition was “telescoped” to reduce length, meaning that each bomblet would extend in size during flight. When fully extended, a standoff fuse protruded from the front of the missile, with a HEAT warhead in the middle and stablising strakes in the back. The submunitions deploy in an elliptical pattern, meaning two weapons could cover an area the size of a football pitch. The weapon was designed for use at low-level, with an arming vane being released after separation from the aircraft. This would trigger hydraulic rams that would jettison the bomb’s outer skin, followed by the inflation of a series of compressed-air filled bladders, that would force the bomblets outwards. Once in the air, they fully extend and glide towards the target. The bomb saw use with the RAF in the Falklands War in 1982, and in Operation Granby in 1991.


Mk.1 Bomblet: In a cluster bomb, the main destructive aspect is not the bomb itself, but rather, the bomblets it released. In the case of the BL.755, this was the Mk.1 bomblet, which carried a HEAT warhead, aimed specifically at working against the top armour of Soviet tanks. Each bomb would contain a total of 147 of these submunitions, divided into seven sections of 21 bomblets each. The release process described above would project the bomblets outwards, some up to 18 metres away, in an elliptical shape, in order to cover the greatest distance possible. This is necessary in order to give each aircraft greater damage potential than with normal bombs or rockets, allowing multiple targets to be damaged or destroyed in one single pass, allowing for greater survivability rates. Aircraft would fly low, at treetop level and at high speed in order to reduce the reaction time of enemy AA. Multiple bombs would be dropped, with time between releases depending on the concentration of vehicles in the column. Each bomblet was “extendable”, being compressed in their respective section until ejected, when they would extend in both directions. To the front, a probe for the HEAT warhead would pop out, wild in the back, fins would extend outwards. These would stabilise the bomblet whilst in flight. Upon contact with enemy armour, the bomblet’s shaped charge would release an explosively formed jet that could penetrate up to 250mm of armour, in addition to releasing fragmentation which was could be used against surrounding infantry and lightly armoured vehicles.

IBL.755: The appearance of the T-72, and eventually the T-80, in ever-growing quantities meant that the effectiveness of BL.755 was become less relevant. The VJ.291 guided-cluster bomb was meant to solve this, but was cancelled in 1980 on the grounds that it lacked effectiveness. AST.1227 was a competition held to find a new anti-armour weapon. Various different proposals were made, including for both Maverick and Paveway, as well as various dispenser types, but these were found to be ineffective. In the end, the Improved BL.755, or IBL.755 was chosen. Standard BL.755s were upgraded, since it was mostly a change in the bomblet that occurred, which was able to defeat the top armour of the T-72. The main difference is the fact that the submunitions were now parachute-xxxx. The IBL.755 saw use in the Kosovo War in 1999, and in Operation Telic in 2003.

RBL.755: An improvement of the IBL.755 with the radio altimeter taken from retired WE.177 nuclear bombs. This allowed for the bomb to be dropped from a higher altitude, yet still offer a high saturation on a target, which decreases as altitude increases, thus allowing it to remain useful. The RBL.755 saw use in the Kosovo War in 1999, and in Operation Telic in 2003.

Mk.2 bomblet: The Mk.2 bomblet was intended to improve upon and replace the Mk.1 bomblet, and was used in the IBL.755 and later on, the RBL.755, variants, which were improvements of the BL.755. The Mk.2 is almost identical to the Mk.1, and is the same size when folded, but differs mainly in the use of a parachute, rather than the stabilising fins. This was done to give a smaller overall impact pattern on the ground, allowing the bomblets to be concentrated over a smaller area, and thus, meaning more bomblets are put on target. In addition to this, the parachute allows the effective angle against armour to increase, allowing for more effective penetration.

BL.755 could be carried on:

  • Blackburn Buccaneer S.1 (test)/S.2

  • Hawker Siddeley Harrier GR.1/T.2/GR.3/T.4

  • BAE Sea Harrier FRS.1/FA.2

  • BAE Hawk 50/100/200

  • SEPECAT Jaguar GR.1/T.2/GR.3/T.4

  • Panavia Tornado GR.1

  • McDonnell Douglas Phantom FGR.2


  • BAE Sea Harrier FRS.1/FA.2

  • BAE Hawk 100/200

  • SEPECAT Jaguar GR.1/T.2/GR.3/T.4

  • Panavia Tornado GR.1/GR.4

  • BAE Harrier GR.5/GR.7/GR.9/T.10/T.12

Retirement: The BL.755 family was retired in 2007 from British service in accordance with the Convention on Cluster Munitions, being replaced by CRV7, Brimstone and Paveway.










Conclusion: This weapon would make British aircraft much more effective in game, increasing their survivability and their ability to deal with multiple targets in one pass. The lack of PGMs on most British aircraft can certainly be felt, and while not making up for the difference completely, the BL.755 family will most certainly improve the ground attack capabilities in game.



CAT-UXO - Bl 755 mk1 submunition

CAT-UXO - Bl 755 mk2 submunition

GBR - BL-755 : Cluster Bombs and Submunition

AP 101B-4101-15B

AP 101B-0607-15B

AP 101B-3101 & 2-15C

AP 3456H, Part 5, Sect 1, Chap 2

“Typhoon to Typhoon: RAF Air Support Projects and Weapons Since 1945” by Chris Gibson

“British Secret Projects: Hypersonics, Ramjets and Missiles” by Chris Gibson

WT Live // Images by OsO73

Harrier GR.5 ZD346 carrying 7 BL755 cluster bombs. by fighterman35 on DeviantArt

A RAF McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II carrying seven BL755

Special thanks to @Gunjob for the primary sources from the RAF Museum. This suggestion would have been much harder and much less detailed without them.


Here is a typical impact pattern;

You can expect good coverage over an area of 200x500ft (WxL) increasing by number of weapons delivered as well.


Yes +1

1 Like

Don’t forget the Swiss Hunter F.Mk.58… = )

However, atm there are no CBU’s in game, and no clue if and when they would come…

German F-104G

German F-4F

1 Like

Reposting my collection of images of non-British BL755 use:

A-7K weapon delivery manual T.O. 1A-7K-34-1-1 detailing fuze setting for the Mk1 and Mk2 dispenser:

So perhaps confusingly, there is a Mk1 and Mk2 dispenser as well as the Mk1 and Mk2 bomblets detailed above. The A-7 manual describes that the Mk2 type dispensers can be discerned by having a longer hardback for the bomb lugs. And we can see that comparing the RAF Mk1 dispensers in the opening post, with some of the export bombs seen in the gallery at the start of this post.
T.O. 1A-7K-34-1-1 states that ballistic data for some of the BL755 configurations can be found in the companion document T.O. 1A-7K-34-1-2. If anybody happens to come across a copy of that - do share!

Also, this image from the opening post shows the RBL-755 dispenser. The radio-altimeter/ground-proximity sensors are the brown bumps on the tail unit, just ahead of the fins.
The RBL755 sensors can also be seen on the Mk4 dispenser at the RAF Museum Hendon. This one fitted with MACE lugs for carriage on RAF Tornado.
The Mk4 dispenser was the version initially used for IBL755 before the tail kit modification for RBL755, and apparently had different fuze timing options to the Mks 1and 2. In addition to the modified tail kit the RBL755 equipped Mk4 dispensers had “RBL 755 MOD” stencilled in white on top. This is partially visible in the other linked images.

I have no info on what the Mk3 dispenser was. Perhaps the version for Yugoslavia’s MiG-21 etc. with non-NATO bomb lugs


Upon browsing this discussion regarding Chinese LGBs and noticing Chinese BL755 variants in the background of some images, I was able to discern a little bit of info about China’s domestic BL755 copies that we had seen displayed with the Nanchang Q5 in the past.

Firstly, the BL755 produced in China by Norinco is called YJ-1

and China produces a domestic copy of the Mk.1 submunition, for these bombs and other Chinese dispensers. The following image is a screengrab from a video presentation about the YJ-6 Gliding munitions dispenser

Notably the YJ-1C version on display is labelled as a “Regional Blockade Bomb”, which seems to be a poor translation of what is typically known as an Area Denial Weapon in the West. This suggests that this particular YJ-1C variant performs the function of HADES (Hunting Area DEnial System) which was an export version of BL755 loaded with the HB 876 scatter-able mine submunition familiar from the Tornado’s JP233 dispenser.

Perhaps most interesting of all though is that China produces a GPS/INS guided version of BL755 with manoeuvring tail fins. Thus creating an analogue to the American CBU-103 WCMD (Wind-Correcting Munitions Dispenser), modernisation of the unguided CBU-87. This version is designated YJ-2

1 Like

I suppose it could be suggested in their section as well

This would be a great addition if Gaijin introduce CBUs!

1 Like