Source?
Many times provided even by moderators on ru forum. Why should I waste my time looking for a file to prove something to you? Are you a gajin?
I have no interest in arguing with the victims of western propaganda, just as I have no interest in arguing about the rearward movement of the t-90 with the victims of russian propaganda
1 Like
Typical of Russian equipment supporters. Make bold claims and there’s never a single shred of evidence to back it up. Yet the claim is followed by “Get educated” or “why should I look it up?”
6 Likes
sure bud we are victims of western propaganda if you got proof that Russia can make high quality and modern thermals that would be nice to share
Thinks wrong with abrams:
1.Missing DU in the turret and in the hull
2.Heat munition ignoring ufp angle
3.Turret ring incorrect thickness (50.8mm), should be volumetric and ~~300mm
4.Incorrect and outdated information on m1 armor (based on swedish trial m1a2 export variant)
5. Wrong shell penetration (implies to pretty much every tank)
6.M1a2 sepv2 missing its flir1 improved 2nd generation+ thermal sights
7.Missing kevlar spall liners
8.Incorrect left fuel tank armor thickness
9.Fuel tanks rarely but sometimes explode after one solis shot penetration
10.M1a2 sepv2 missing m829a3
11.Ufp wrong thickness (war thunder 38mm, irl 51mm) if anyone disagrees with whatever I said I can drop official source or mesaured thickness of a plate
18 Likes
You can find them yourself, as I did to bring the AH-64 FLIR to real values.
I have already said that these sources have been provided many times to the developers and demonstrated many times on the forum. I am not your messenger and will not wash your eyes of your illusions
If they make such high quality thermals, why did they buy thermals from the French company Thales before the war started?
3 Likes
“No? Thought so.” You really thought you did something there huh 😂
1 Like
Can you guys take the T-90 thermals talk out of an M1 hull armor thread pls?
3 Likes
you need to understand that this is IMPERATIVE to debating how to best address the abrams armor
1 Like
realistic war thunder be like:
chance to spawn without thermals on t-90m, t-90a, t-72b3, and t-80bvm
5 Likes
What else is there to do? Let’s be honest.
We’ve all spent years going through the proper channels as per gaijin and they will only do what they want.
Only thing they actually respond to is mass anger and criticism. Get pissed and turn it into a shit show, and like after the review bombing they will BEGRUDGINGLY make 75% of the changes requested until the hate dies down. Genuinely the only way to get anything done.
15 Likes
Actually make that the sights resolution is taken from the sight not generation. Type 90s and Leopards would have such trash thermals anymore.
never said it wasn’t
I know, I’m just saying it aloud for the whole class lol
1 Like
Alright hold my beer while i find some secret documents and lose my clearence
1 Like
For the love of god get your own thread. Helicopter thermals has absolutely nothing to do with M1 hull armor. Jesus christ
4 Likes
This permission was granted to the developers in a bug report they accepted my acquaintance. What more do you need?
A person degraded Ka-52 thermal imager to realistic quality according to the documentation
Official documents and actual capabilities are a different thing when it comes to Russian stuff lets be real. Official documents say the Su-57 is a fifth gen fighter and can fight and win against the F-22 or F-35 but also state that it has a radar cross section of a Super Hornet, while the aforementioned F-22 and F-35 have (publicly released) radar cross sections the size of a butterfly
And there were dozens and dozens of declassified DOD and congressional documents given to Gaijin about the Abrams improved hull armor, and they decided “Mmmmmm, no. Hehe :)”
So it’s obvious them accepting documents has absolutely no merit on whether or not something is real
6 Likes