“No? Thought so.” You really thought you did something there huh 😂
1 Like
Can you guys take the T-90 thermals talk out of an M1 hull armor thread pls?
3 Likes
you need to understand that this is IMPERATIVE to debating how to best address the abrams armor
1 Like
realistic war thunder be like:
chance to spawn without thermals on t-90m, t-90a, t-72b3, and t-80bvm
5 Likes
What else is there to do? Let’s be honest.
We’ve all spent years going through the proper channels as per gaijin and they will only do what they want.
Only thing they actually respond to is mass anger and criticism. Get pissed and turn it into a shit show, and like after the review bombing they will BEGRUDGINGLY make 75% of the changes requested until the hate dies down. Genuinely the only way to get anything done.
15 Likes
Actually make that the sights resolution is taken from the sight not generation. Type 90s and Leopards would have such trash thermals anymore.
never said it wasn’t
I know, I’m just saying it aloud for the whole class lol
1 Like
Alright hold my beer while i find some secret documents and lose my clearence
1 Like
For the love of god get your own thread. Helicopter thermals has absolutely nothing to do with M1 hull armor. Jesus christ
4 Likes
This permission was granted to the developers in a bug report they accepted my acquaintance. What more do you need?
A person degraded Ka-52 thermal imager to realistic quality according to the documentation
Official documents and actual capabilities are a different thing when it comes to Russian stuff lets be real. Official documents say the Su-57 is a fifth gen fighter and can fight and win against the F-22 or F-35 but also state that it has a radar cross section of a Super Hornet, while the aforementioned F-22 and F-35 have (publicly released) radar cross sections the size of a butterfly
And there were dozens and dozens of declassified DOD and congressional documents given to Gaijin about the Abrams improved hull armor, and they decided “Mmmmmm, no. Hehe :)”
So it’s obvious them accepting documents has absolutely no merit on whether or not something is real
6 Likes
I expected to be brutally and violently disappointed
Anyone who actually cares about the M1 hull armor, please start reporting the off topic posts
6 Likes
Preach the truth brother
NATO dev, NATO game, actually. They’re based in NATO legally and financially, the majority of their employees are in NATO (4x more than the tiny number in Russia), their internal servers are in NATO.
There is Russian bias in the vehicles, but not for political reasons obviously for a NATO company. It’s because they would make less money from top tier packs if Russia didn’t have any vehicles at top tier (and probably also less money from NATO mains if they just fought boring mirror matches all the time). Russian tanks would not be at top tier if they weren’t held up by crutches (or NATO tanks being nerfed). So… buffed and nerfed they are, respectively. Gaijin likes money, not Putin
edit: very obviously not against the rules, get unflagged son
1 Like
On god this has gotten so off topic (and I am not helping) so back to the armor
If the tank weighs more, and there are documents present that state that armor was applied (but just not how much because obviously that’ll be classified), that equals no armor added ever right? Or am I missing something? Did all that weight go into electronics? It couldn’t have, especially with miniaturization. The tank carries the same amount of ammo, has the same engine, etc. So clearly what happened is they made a void that sucked any armor they added and reduced the plate to the standards of the M1 back in 1979, and in the process added 10-15t of weight to it
Seeing as he hasn’t responded, and his beginning points were both irrelevant and desperate… It would seem I did.
“Hull Armor of the M1 Abrams” doesn’t sound like the “General gripes and opinions” thread
10 Likes