Gaijin ground devs continue to go out of their way to nerf the US ground tree. Its been an issue since the tree was added. From nerfing APCB performance, to refusing to give US tanks service ammunition, to giving the tree worse variants of vehicles than foreign trees also operated.
All Gaijin is achieving is to drive away bug reporters and long time players. The idea that the US would not up-armor the hull of its main battle tank after 40 years of service is beyond absurd.
What?
Again, what?
cough HSTV-L, M1128 (x2), XM1060 (best ADS in game), 4 variants of the XM8/AGS prototypes, a Turkish M60 (a bastardization of the SLEP), the Israel Dor-Dalet (Israel doesn’t even get this variant), the OH-58D (I can only find a very select few units fielding these 100M USD relics), a prototype AH-64 (who doesn’t need 4?), and… The MBT-70, which seemingly has 2 existing unfinished prototypes.
Do you have any of those prototype variants in-game? No? Thought so.
I belive hes talking about the imported thermals used by russia before the 2022 war.
Haha its funny when soviets are telling we have propaganda in west :D
Russia has completely replaced foreign matrices with production of its own.
That’s true, actually. I am surprised when people write nonsense here without reading any literature on T series tanks
Common gaijin L
Yes but the imported thermals were superior to local prodcution, so in a way him claiming that they cant produce the thermals they used to use is correct.
Today on Russian war machine propaganda the game
Jokes aside I can’t believe they used the suspension as an excuse like there wouldn’t be modifications that wouldn’t be made to account for the extra 20kg/m.
ok so what ever is on the Wikipedia ISNT CLASSIFED so the M1A1 HC has a DU package the the M1A2 Sep V2 has a DU package so does the Sep and even just the M1a2 Abrams has a DU package gaijin maybe you should start going to wikipedia and maybe hit CTRL+F and type DU package or depleted and yea wheres our DU sabots at
That would require gaijin to look at documents instead of relying on their “beliefs”. And we all know gaijin believing something is more reliable than dozens of declassified DoD documents
Sure thing bud
You actually do not read the documentation and blindly believe in your propaganda, which is the opposite of rf propaganda. Ridiculous.
Two sides of the same coin.
Yet again sure thing bud
Source?
Many times provided even by moderators on ru forum. Why should I waste my time looking for a file to prove something to you? Are you a gajin?
I have no interest in arguing with the victims of western propaganda, just as I have no interest in arguing about the rearward movement of the t-90 with the victims of russian propaganda
Typical of Russian equipment supporters. Make bold claims and there’s never a single shred of evidence to back it up. Yet the claim is followed by “Get educated” or “why should I look it up?”
sure bud we are victims of western propaganda if you got proof that Russia can make high quality and modern thermals that would be nice to share
Thinks wrong with abrams:
1.Missing DU in the turret and in the hull
2.Heat munition ignoring ufp angle
3.Turret ring incorrect thickness (50.8mm), should be volumetric and ~~300mm
4.Incorrect and outdated information on m1 armor (based on swedish trial m1a2 export variant)
5. Wrong shell penetration (implies to pretty much every tank)
6.M1a2 sepv2 missing its flir1 improved 2nd generation+ thermal sights
7.Missing kevlar spall liners
8.Incorrect left fuel tank armor thickness
9.Fuel tanks rarely but sometimes explode after one solis shot penetration
10.M1a2 sepv2 missing m829a3
11.Ufp wrong thickness (war thunder 38mm, irl 51mm) if anyone disagrees with whatever I said I can drop official source or mesaured thickness of a plate
