HQ11 lacks the accompanying 1130 close-in defense system

The HQ-11 is a missile-artillery integrated system, currently lacking a land-based 1130 close-in artillery carrier vehicle

In the introductory video of the Zhuhai Airshow, it is clearly stated that the HQ-11 includes two vehicles: a radar missile vehicle and an anti-aircraft gun vehicle.

video:https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV12G4y1x7aB/?spm_id_from=333.337.search-card.all.click&vd_source=e41d07f81c3ac4db9d937dc6618e096e

The current HQ-11 is affectionately dubbed HQ-5.5 by Chinese players。akin to how the 9A317M system launch vehicle can operate independently. It is equally unreasonable and unrealistic to only provide the 9A317M and not the 9S18M3

Similar reactions in the issues section: 【红旗11是弹炮合一系统,目前缺少一个陆基的1130近防炮运载车】 Community Bug Reporting System

24 Likes

agree,we don"t need a Tor-M1Plus

6 Likes

I’m a bit confused
Do you want the vehicle renamed or do you want it to be a multi-sam with the rotary cannon?
image

HQ5.5 has never been an official name; it is a derogatory term for HQ11 in the game, which currently lacks a close-range defense system, indicating that it is only half as powerful as the real-life HQ11

4 Likes

Solution A: Give HQ-11 ability to spawn its radar-less loader/ TEL vehicle.

Images of loader vehicle




OR;
Solution B: Give all Tier 8 non multi-vehicle SPAA a free spawn if you spawn this vehicle once. And you still could use backup to spawn for third time - then you got the fourth spawn for free. Free respawn count 50% repair cost.

6 Likes

Yes

Cmon how cool would that be?

Yes, she is very cool. And considering the limitation of the shooting range, she won’t disrupt the balance in the game, because fixed-wing aircraft can easily launch attacks from outside the shooting range

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

While I’d really like to see it as a china main, but adding the 1130 close-in artillery carrier vehicle would be too unbalanced. The point of such AA systems is that they can’t operate at close range, so this system will be capable of engaging targets at any range.

thats not correct at all.

how come Pantsir exists with 4 30mm guns as well as 20km SAMs?

IRIS-T has TVC and can engage at really close range as well.

the chinese shouldnt get shafted with a single vehicle in the age of multi vehicle sams. this just reduces their survivability.

at least they should get the TEL vehicle with the extra missiles but no radar.

as for the gun CIWS, it can be discussed further

7 Likes

There are two solutions: either one missile launch vehicle and 1130 close in guns, or two missile launch vehicles without radar can be placed on the radar vehicle

At the Zhuhai Airshow, the HQ-11 air defense system has been clearly stated to be a combination of the FM-3000 and LD-3000. If Gaijin insists that it only consists of the FM-3000, then it should not be called the HQ-11, but rather the FM-3000 missile launcher. Based on the current test server data, the FM-3000 missile launcher not only has a small ammunition capacity but also is not a particularly powerful missile in terms of paper specifications. Of course, adding the LD-3000 may not make a significant difference, but since Gaijin promotes its vehicles as historically accurate, it should equip the LD-3000 for the system.

4 Likes


3
The HQ-11 should be renamed unless given the LD-2000 CRAM as the name HQ-11 incorporates both systems

2 Likes

metasource

This looks so dope, I definitely want to see SAM accompanied by SPAAGs.

1 Like

If it would be unbalanced then why even waste dev time on the HQ11 when the HQ16 exists… it literally makes no sense at all

That’s the Gaijin slogan right there

2 Likes

I prefer the vehicle as it is now rather than having two other launcher vehicles. Gaijin should just add an unlockable modification to get both launcher vehicles so everyone is happy