How would YOU implement Australia in War Thunder? (With Poll)

Machinery of War Discussion Nations not present in WT
13

I don’t think 1 has even been delivered yet

14

put it with usa since m1a1 aim is already there

15

We need a commonwealth Tree, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India etc.

16

change the name of the Great Britain tree to Commonwealth of Nations tree. move all Canadian and Australian vehicles from the USA and german tree into it and have specific lines for the AU NZ and CAN vehicles

1 Like
17

Nono, give it to france or italy instead

18

you ain’t taking my M1 AIM away from me

19

the aim is only in the US tech tree because it was a us built vehicle sold to australia

20

Just so the Brit’sh TT can get a Grant with the Aussi applique transmission armor and grenade mesh.

1 Like
21

If Wiki isn’t lying as it sometimes does, they took delivery of the first 2 in 2022.

1 Like
22

it’s called the british tech tree mate

@Phazer as i said above

23

Commonwealth sub tree in the UK tree, along with Canada, New Zealand, and already included South Africa. Done right it can provide a major boost to the UK tree as somewhat of the “major” Commonwealth powers.
Personally, I’d put India in it’s own tree because to my knowledge they don’t have equipment to start low like everyone else and would have to start in Rank 4 like Israel does. I’m not really a big fan of India’s current implementation, as if they go through with it (and you can argue they have) it somewhat destroys asymmetry in tech trees (prime example: T-90 Bishma) and would make it so that you can just play one tree and get everything. At least for Commonwealth (Canada, Australia, NZ, South Africa) they are mostly western-influenced designs and so asymmetry would be preserved.
Also Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian ships are already in the British tree. Might as well keep going.

1 Like
24

LATAM should go to Israel I think, Australia should just be an “independent nation” in that it doesn’t have a specific nation it belongs too. The M1A1 AIM should be in the American tree, but something like the AC.IV should be in the British tree. It just depends.

25

i think india should go to uk tree but im not sure if aus or canada goes to uk. i feel canada should as aus uses a lot of british and canadian imports and canada has more original vehicles than aus. and i want india first so they don’t have an excuse to make more goddamnned premiums for them

also do you think they should change who taiwan goes to? it’s gonna feel real weird with abrams in china lmao

26

Canada and Australia are fairly close in number of indigenous vehicles.

1 Like
27

could you provide examples? i’m mostly going off if i think the CF-18 or F/A-18 should be added, and im looking at jets a lot as that’s what i think britian needs quite a bit of.

28

CF-100 bro
its like the Canadian jet

4 Likes
29

Let us see here you want just domestic jets? Well for Canada:

CF-100(6), CF-105(2), CL-41(2/3). If I’m able to add all domestic Aircraft those numbers could be upped with: FDB-1(1), Vancouver(2), CL-84(1), CP-107(2).

Now if I add licensed built jets:

CL-13(4), CT-133(1), CF-104(2), CF-116(2)

If I want into licensed-built props we’d be here all day, and that isn’t everything for Canada’s jet age either. We’d be here all day if I went into the ground stuff as well.

Oh, the number in () is the number of WT possible variants of aircraft. At least as far as I can tell from my research.

2 Likes
30

i wanted australian domsetic jets. i don’t care about canadian ones that i already know

@S3b5

1 Like
31

So are we talking about only indigenous designs, or all jets built in Australia, or also including jets that were unique to Australia? The numbers for indigenous designs are more so propped up by props (pun intended). I did link my aviation tree suggestion for Australia at the bottom of the original post, feel free to take a look through that. There was a total of 43 aircraft (including different variants of the same type) that were designed by or unique to Australia and New Zealand in the suggestion.
All of the jet age ones though are modified variants of overseas models. Sometimes quite heavily though, as with the CAC Sabres for example. There were some indigenous designs being developed but unfortunately those programs were cancelled before reach prototype phases. I posted about them in a reply on the aviation suggestion thread.

3 Likes
32

i just looked through it, it looks pretty decent however i still think a sub tree for aus is best

one person i’ve met has said canada should go to america not uk, do you have any opinion on the matter?

1 Like