How would YOU implement Australia in War Thunder? (With Poll)

Machinery of War Discussion Nations not present in WT
5

I only want 2 ways. Commonwealth sub-tree for Great Britain or Commonwealth tech tree.

I see no issues with it. Of those Commonwealth nations only a handful of them even have tanks. Also, it allows avoiding as much copy-paste as possible.

1 Like
6

Interesting results so far, almost the exact opposite of the order I would choose lmao. My preference at the moment is:
1st- Pacific Nations, for which I have cast my vote. Keeping it local with allies in the region would feel like going for the local sports team. And judging by recent passed to developers, Indonesia has a reasonable level of interest and content as well.
2nd- Together with Canada, because the tree would be healthy and I’d honestly like to see Canada in the game as well
3rd- With Israel, lots of room for content expansion there and Israel really does need something else

1 Like
7

A commonwealth tree that includes UK, Australia, Canada, India and New Zealand is the only correct answer

4 Likes
8

Yes

9

Can I have 15 crew slots for it?

1 Like
10

Pls don’t let the abrams be the next sherman, so be wherever needed not as a new TT( gonna be tons of copy and paste anyway)

1 Like
11

Of all the nations to operate Abrams, only one is basically already a tree in the game, Taiwan, and that Abrams hasn’t even been added yet. I don’t see it proliferating through all the trees more than the Leopard already has any time soon.
Any one of the options will still provide enough unique content to make them interesting imo. Basically can’t add anything now that doesn’t have a share of copy paste in it.

12

+1

Either with Canada or in an independent ANZAC tree itself. As with Canada, they can help out with the few weaknesses they each have, and the other option comes from the fact the air tree has 4 lines and as pointed out being a home for other Pacific nations barring they all don’t go to Japan.

Why not the UK? It’s still mission a large number of domestic vehicles and the sub-trees it already has makes it full.

Why not Commonwealth? As pointed out the commonwealth is 56 nations which have used just about every vehicle to exist. And as Sub-trees has shown “More nations = More C&P” not less. Meaning between the nearly 56 nations you would be lucky if it contains even 5 unique vehicles as Gaijin would pick the C&P first, showing us that “Less nation = Less C&P” with a tree is how things work.

2 Likes
13

I don’t think 1 has even been delivered yet

14

put it with usa since m1a1 aim is already there

15

We need a commonwealth Tree, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India etc.

16

change the name of the Great Britain tree to Commonwealth of Nations tree. move all Canadian and Australian vehicles from the USA and german tree into it and have specific lines for the AU NZ and CAN vehicles

1 Like
17

Nono, give it to france or italy instead

18

you ain’t taking my M1 AIM away from me

19

the aim is only in the US tech tree because it was a us built vehicle sold to australia

20

Just so the Brit’sh TT can get a Grant with the Aussi applique transmission armor and grenade mesh.

1 Like
21

If Wiki isn’t lying as it sometimes does, they took delivery of the first 2 in 2022.

1 Like
22

it’s called the british tech tree mate

@Phazer as i said above

23

Commonwealth sub tree in the UK tree, along with Canada, New Zealand, and already included South Africa. Done right it can provide a major boost to the UK tree as somewhat of the “major” Commonwealth powers.
Personally, I’d put India in it’s own tree because to my knowledge they don’t have equipment to start low like everyone else and would have to start in Rank 4 like Israel does. I’m not really a big fan of India’s current implementation, as if they go through with it (and you can argue they have) it somewhat destroys asymmetry in tech trees (prime example: T-90 Bishma) and would make it so that you can just play one tree and get everything. At least for Commonwealth (Canada, Australia, NZ, South Africa) they are mostly western-influenced designs and so asymmetry would be preserved.
Also Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian ships are already in the British tree. Might as well keep going.

1 Like
24

LATAM should go to Israel I think, Australia should just be an “independent nation” in that it doesn’t have a specific nation it belongs too. The M1A1 AIM should be in the American tree, but something like the AC.IV should be in the British tree. It just depends.