If I were a Gaijin, I would have also asked how much money you spend on the game per month. That way it’s easier to separate the players who should be listened to from those who should be ignored forever.
2 Likes
Balance thrown out the window.
Defo a year of all years.
2 Likes
they doesnt know whats going to hit them
3 Likes
Oh boy this will be WILD
This is going to be crazier than most backlash this year i call it
Still zero Battle Rating decompression for Naval. Still no option to use the old Naval Arcade aiming system. Big thumbs down on everything Naval since the Leviathans update 👎 (Yes, I filled out the survey. Yes, I posted my opinions about Naval Battles there.)
Soyuz STILL allowed to seal club everything else in Naval:
1 Like
at least they know the game is not in a good shape so they are finally listening, better than nothing
2 Likes
And 0 (zero) French ground or air additions for the past 8 months, it’s much more important to jam the tech tree and premium section full of copy-paste Leopards and F-16s instead.
4 Likes
Read enough, 3000 more Leopards instead of cool and unique belgian or french additions that add variety and new Chassis for example
Look at me guys, I am so edgy. I will intentionally break the rules to show you how bad they are for punishing me for breaking the rules. rumble rumble.
Please stick to the topic and do not break the rules guys. Don’t be like WhiteAtDawn (who will take a break from forum for some time).
Thanks!
10 Likes
wont people just put bad things on the survey just because i dont think some of these players will be honest about true thoughts
1 Like
directly to the shredder
You underestimate how easy it is to brush off rant type replies in a survey.
Anyways, I did my survey and I think it’s most informative (particularly in the last section where we can yap).
1 Like
Is it not the truth?
The feedback can get passed but it’ll land on deaf ears.
I get it, it’s a lot of work. Appreciating community feedback seems like a completely lost feat these days however, especially when some parts of that feedback show how critical that is to the game’s health.
2 Likes
I hope my feedback doesn’t get lost in the sea of trolling; I genuinely hope devs read all the constructive criticism by hand and don’t have an AI do a summary for them.
2 Likes
Sure, there are always people who just want to be dumb. Doesn’t matter though. There are already people who post dumb stuff on the forums all the time. It is easy to see through the nonsense. It is only their loss if they want to post dumb stuff, don’t worry about it.
Some of them will, it’s internet. But such surveys also provide A LOT of great feedback. The fact, that trolls are usually the most vocal doesn’t change the fact that WT community is full of players who can voice themselves on higher level :)
2 Likes
The frustration is completely valid
While his reaction isn’t necessarily appropriate a vast amount of the playerbase is sick and tired of how gaijin is handling player feedback and implementing vehicles/weapons/features as well as balancing the game.
5 Likes
Overall not the worst but far from the best.
UI/QoL additions have been great.
New gameplay features have been ok.
New vehicles have been ok but there has been a lack of WW2 additions and some decisions that have been ridiculous like the F-14D being locked away as a premium. Would be nice to have a wider spread of era’s regarding additions (maybe even a new era in the form of WW1).
Would be nice to see some “gimmick” vehicles added like what we saw last year and the year before (F-117 and WW1 tanks). Stuff that while functionally useless are still interesting and can be fun in their own way.
Obligatory where’s Poland?
1 Like