I requested to lower the BR of this 2 heavy bombers but gaijin leave no response why they didn’t lower it as there quite a few people who supported this idea. Updated Planned Battle Rating Changes (April 2026) - #125 by O_Warrior0
It’s not popular enough to get a reply, unfortunately. The Su-30 stole the spotlight.
We cant even have a proper evaluation of tu95’s br until the major bugs for it are fixed. Right now the cannons are completely broken. The countermeasure system is also broken. AM23 is supposed to fire at 1200rpm, and uses identical ammo to the gsh23, which is higher velocity than nr23 rounds. Gaijins decision to disable one of the belly cannons for countermeasures makes zero sense, because the integrated countermeasure dispenser on tu95 is already compatible with chaff and flares… The flares themselves spawn so far away from the vehicle that ir missiles tend to ignore them completely. So we currently have a plane with less than half its defensive firepower, a disabled cannon on an extremely important part of the plane, and flares that dont really work.
For B52, I think it should absolutely go to 8.3. But Tu95 in its current state is actually worse than tu4 in actual gameplay. Hell its worse than an il28 beacuse at least that things tailgun is functional. 8.0 for it sounds perfect. Right now it faces 9.3 like 80 percent of the time