Vehicle: C13 T90
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: Stay 7.0 or 7.0 -----> 6.7
Reason:Lack of armor, insufficient ammunition, and inconvenience main gun firepower.It doesn’t deserve to be 7.3
14 Likes
Has the R-27ER finally been removed from the 9-12s or are they going to 12.3 to compress the game even further?
No
Nope, the change only applies to sim
1 Like
-_-
Mr snail R2Y2 still 8.0 😾7.7 will help them.
8 Likes
Aircraft:
Tu-95M
B-52H
Tu-4
Mode:
Air RB and Air AB
Proposed change:
Tu-95M 8.3 -----> 8.0
B-52H 8.7 ------> 8.3
Tu-4 8.0 ------> 7.0
Reasoning:
Maps currently aren’t big enough for them to climb to play like an strategic bomber and are currently mostly defenceless against supersonic aircraft. They may have the ability to flare missiles but would not be able to defend themselves against aircraft with SALCOS and radar missiles. Both can definitely be more playable and fair with a slight BR change. For the Tu-4 it even worse and 7.0 will hopefully make it more playable.
6 Likes
Vehicle: BMPT and BMPT-72
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: Both need to go up to 12.3
Reason: Performing way too strong to be anything lower
2 Likes
Oh I didn’t catch that at first. Should be fine since the SPO-15 is so bad.
1 Like
I really like the Ground decopression you did at the 3.3 - 4.0 range.
Two things: the new 4.0 vehichles, such as Panzer 4 H should be rank 3 vehichles.
Jagdpanzer 4 and Hetzer at 4.3 might have a bit too good of time feeding on the T-34s.
5 Likes
B-29 7.0 → 6.3
Tu-4 8.0 → 7.0
Tu-4 is only that high and overtiered because the B-29 is also overtiered, and the Tu-4 uses it as a reference for performance.
6 Likes
Vehicles: Leclerc S1 And S2
BR change: 12.7 → 12.3
Reason: to create a lineup with leopard 2a5NL and to make this tanks more useful they currently have no place in 12.7-13.0 BR since they lack armor and a better round still stuck with 580mm pen.
2 Likes
(translator)
RB
AH-64DJP (linear and prem) 11.7-11.3
due to the issuance of the early AN-64 AGM114K, the Japanese began to look even worse due to the lack of LWS and IRCM, and there was parity in armament. Before that, the Japanese had more advanced weapons to the detriment of electronics, but now they have nothing to be considered equal to the rest of the Apaches.
The premium Su-30s are STILL not going up?
Holy crap can y’all actually just stop killing 12.3-13.3?
PLEASE???
6 Likes
580mm pen should still be good though for 12.7 though?
Given all the changes to the medium tanks around them (Pz IVs, the early T-34s and the M4A1) the fact that the M4A2, the Sherman III/IV and the M4A3 105 are staying at their current BRs is actively hilarious.
1 Like
I agree with moving them down but this point really did not make any sense. Any apfsds with more then 500mm of pen can easily take out any tank at br range of 10.0 to 12.7
Vehicle: Stirling B Mk III (stirling_mk3)
Mode: Air RB
BR: 4.7 → 4.0
Reasoning: With the Lancaster B Mk I now moving down to 4.7 which is better in every way compared to the Stirling Mk III it’s unfair to have two planes at the same BR with wildly different capabilities. Furthermore comparing the Stirling Mk I and Mk III there isn’t enough of a capability gap to warrant a 0.7 or even a 0.3 br difference. I believe that the Mk III should go to 4.0 along with the Mk I.
9 Likes
Vehicle: Lancaster B Mk III (lancaster_mk3)
Mode: Air RB
BR: 5.0 → 4.7
Reasoning: With the Lancaster B Mk I now moving down to 4.7 the Mk III should move with it. The difference between the Mk I and III is the change from Rolls Royce to Packard Merlins, a change from 4 .303 Browning guns in the tail turret to 2 .50 Browning guns and the removal of the H2S blister underneath. If the removal of the blister does affect the drag coefficient then it would be better than the Mk I but not enough for a .3 br difference.
6 Likes
Didn’t see the M24, damn
Well I guess it deserved because it was just a better M4
Hopefully they both see rank III
Vehicle
IKV 103
Ground RB:
4.0>4.0
Reducing its BR to 3.3 and removing its shell is the worst possible outcome when the IKV 102 exists and fulfills this role. Forcing the IKV 103 to be used like the 102 makes no sense and only further nerfs a already weak lineup.
16 Likes