Gaijin has been notorious for questioning sources for British vehicles, especially when it comes to buffs and have denied many based upon technicalities.
If there was even the slightest doubt to whether or not it could be done, Gaijin wouldnt have made it possible to intercept APFSDS with the APS.
Theyve done it plenty of times elsewhere, despite Primary sources stating otherwise.
And quite frankly. the only reason the BN isnt 11.7 is because of that APS. If it could only intercept AGMs, Im hardpressed to think of a reason for it to not be 11.7/12.0. Even with it intercepting darts, im still struggling to justify it given most maps are too small for it to be effective
Hi guys, if there is data that shows it can defeat top-tier APFSDS then it’s not a question of if it can/should, but HOW we can get around this APS. Since if it can defeat APFSDS then essentially defeats every projectile in the game.
Do we shoot MG’s at it to set it off prematurely? Would that work?
I don’t have an issue with Black Knight. Frankly I don’t own the tank so I didn’t even know it can’t intercept AGMs. Yes you are right Britain hasn’t gained buffs for many of its MBTs it deserves. I was just using the Black Knight as a jumping pad on the discussion of APS in the future of GRB since lazy Gaijin will literally copy paste the code to all the other nations. It will be an issue when every MBT is intercepting APFSDS rounds long range and maybe even closer knowing how awful the spaghetti code is.
The system is different, but i can not tell you exactly why it cant, as they do not specify it, i suspect it is either slower to react, or uses lighter payload interceptors that are not effective against them.
I’m ok with APS like Iron fist intercepting APFSDS rounds in game IF Gaijin models weakened KE rods. APS shouldn’t be a force field around the tank like how it is with top tier Helis. Also what happens to nations that don’t have hard kill APS like iron fist?