Yeah, but is not that big of a difference, is like PL-12 vs AIM-120 diference at +40km, before that the 77-1 is 1km ahead of the 120
Sounds good
MICA was changed to a smaller notch window and is marginally harder to dodge as of the latest update.
I say marginally because it is near identical until about 2km away, after which the differences can be seen.
1 Like
Interesting, thank you.
1 Like
You are creating a difference in your mind that does not exist in game.
77-1 also wobbles a lot currently. Makes it lose more energy than intended
1 Like
That’s all TVC missiles I think.
77-1 ain’t tvc though
Its not? Thought they were. My bad
Fortunately (or unfortunately?) They aren’t
But fr though, the wobble is kinda crazy
ONly when your target fly dead straight it’s faster on opponent compared on 120.
But if you fire both missiles, from same altitude and same speed, and target turns 90" left, that 120 is faster on target and more likely to even get close to it
Why does everybody think R-77 and R-77-1 are TVC,extremely common mistake to the point I was being gaslit it was for a few days
1 Like
Has it actually been reported?
No clue, gonna do it tomorrow (local time) I guess. Juat need more recordings of it
People just assume everything from RU has TVC.
Probably because it has such high maneuverability and the only missiles that come close are the TVC missiles (MICA and R-73)
2 Likes
Doesn’t France have an F-16 with them? PL-12 isn’t that bad too from what I’ve heard
F-16AM yes
1 Like
why is this even a complaint or a problem the aim120 slightly better at literally just ONE thing the r77-1 is better in every other way but for some reason if its not the second coming of the r27er and broken in every way players arnt happy.
He isn’t complaining, he’s dispelling the myth that the r-77-1 is always longer ranged than the amraam… you are clearly biased on the subject and commenting out of emotion if you cant tell that
Don’t mind him, he’s still traumatized from 27ER being the best at being almost useless in a match.