Nope. You did it the same post again. confused the terms once more
1 Like
By reading and quoting the wikipedia article I posted that describes the differences?
Okay…
Any aircraft that can get CCRP but doesn’t have it in game?
I think the F-86F-35 and 40 can since it had the A4 gunsight and LABS but idk what the criteria for CCRP is.
Do you yet aware that WarThunder doesn’t have Rocket CCRP but only Rocket CCIP after being explained several times?
He has accepted it. he read an article on IRL CCRP and was using it as a basis for his understanding of CCRP in WT. Not realising that gaijin put 0 effort into CCRP and its a fraction of what it should be. That was explained already. No need to keep prodding
Really doubt it. From my understanding he still believes he is the one clarifying, rather than the one being clarified.
I do hope I was wrong.
I got the impression he was clarifying that he was wrong, but trying to point out where his mistake was made. It is not unreasonable to look at “CCRP” in IRL and assume gaijin would match it. I really really hope for a CCRP overhaul at some point soon. its a sham of what it could and should be. So much potential wasted currently
1 Like
Holy moly yes this.
What part of “I stand corrected” did people not understand? I said what I thought was correct, was told I was wrong, fact checked myself and the persons correction, found that to indeed be the case, and responded as so.
I dont know why people are still arguing my credibility. At least you understood Morvran, thanks.
1 Like
Right after your “I stand corrected” phase, you stated:
However that’s not the case in WarThunder.
Which puzzled me a bit.
TLDR, My first impression about the above discussion:
A: 1+1=3
B: No, 1+1=2
A: OK, however 1+1=3
My apology for my misunderstanding but I insist that post is kind of confusing.