For us Chinese players:
Best: no VT4 or any Chinese vehicles in Japanese TT
Second Best: at least not sensitive months like Sep 3rd or Oct 10th
1 Like
Will this also imply that japanese vehicles would be removed from chinese TT?
I understand, please find my comment from earlier, what do you think bout that
I don’t mean to get political, but if that’s the case, out of respect for some people in Poland, the Leopard 2PL should probably be removed from the German tree. For them, it seems it’s not over yet. That’s what you mean, right?
6 Likes
I don’t like splitting nations.
Right now there is no Japan tech tree, there is a techtree that has Japan and Thailand. It’s named Japan because Gaijin is bad at subtrees, but it is both nations.
Personally I hope for subtrees to be reworked with their separate research tree, flag and name. They can still share lineups like they do now, but there is no more nations under another. Japan doesn’t get a Stingray or M60, Thailand does. This should be more clear.
I made a suggestion about it, not specifically about Thailand and Japan, but all subtrees could be better this way.
8 Likes
Japanese do not operated or produced or even tested these Chinese vehicles But we do used these vehicles a lot in our history.That’s the difference
4 Likes
2PL in Germany isn’t the best, but at least its better than PT-91 in USSR
2 Likes
Agree
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
and we are not saying japan used/operated those chinese vehicles lol. we are saying thailand did and since thai and japan are on good terms, then if they were to team up on a war, thats literally vt4 fighting FOR the side of japan and thai
But do you think Japanese players wouldn’t also be displeased that their tanks and aircraft are present in the China tech tree, yet a Chinese tank under Thai service cannot be added because the Chinese players do not like it?
EDIT: what about players from USA? Do they like their planes and tanks being in the China tree?
2 Likes
IIRC first MiG-29 to be added with R-73s was MiG-29SMT.
Which means that between Gaijin saying that MiG-29 will not be recieving R-73 and adding MiG-29 with R-73, there was little over one month.
1 Like
lmao
Honestly if they just added the VT-4 to Japan I wouldn’t be that mad anymore. People would just forget it and move on.
At least China got the vehicle before Japan (unlike Tor-M1 and AV-8B for USSR and US)
To be fair to them, it was a different plane and not the “MiG-29” talked about in the first image. Though the current MiG-29 9-12 is pretty much fictional.
well then it will not be VT-4 being added to Japan next major update, it will be VT-4 (early, Thai) being added, entirely different vehicle :P
1 Like
It will be the Big Boss!
more tear’s will be dropped, ig we should harvest those tears and use it as a drink maybe give some to africa or smthin
Captured/licensed vehicles in Chinese tree (e.g. Soviet T-34) were physically used by Chinese forces. VT4 in Japanese tree has ZERO historical or military ties to Japan – Thailand never operated under Japanese command!
Demanding historical accuracy isn’t hypocrisy. If Gaijin adds US-made Type 90 tank to US tree? Fine! But adding Chinese-made VT4 to Japan with no historical basis? That breaks their OWN rules.
You’re conflating two issues:
Licensed/captured vehicles = Valid (used by nation)
Foreign vehicles in unrelated tree = Invalid (no historical link)
We’ve never denied Thailand operated VT4s . The issue is forcing it into Japan’s tree. When did Thailand become a Japanese protectorate? Did we miss that memo?
Consistency matters. Add Thai VT4 as a Chinese premium if needed, but stop justifying fictional placements.**
4 Likes