I feel like more practical than the ones with multiple vehicles, the only problem will be it might get classed as IFV not SPAA so spawn point will be painful. But never the less it could come as a modification for a Bradley to have different missiles.
Honestly imo Spain should’ve been the Italian subtree, it complements Italy very well in both equipment and feel and also wouldn’t introduce the random Warsaw Pact-equipment into Italy (confusing for sim)
Also they both (on separate ventures) stuffed a 105 into an M47 and that’s funny
M47E2
M47E2 on display in front of the Infantry Academy of Toledo
It could be a mod for the current M3A3 (unless they decide to put an M3A2 instead) but the M6 was based on the M2A2 ODS so. it could work I guess but it isn’t for the cav-scout Bradley’s we have
Was about to say it, it’s been passed to the devs as well
And I’d say it’s extremely practical- while it lacks a radar or IRST it’s got plenty of Stingers and otherwise is basically a TOW-less M3A3
“Minor Axis” is overall not a bad idea, Romania + Hungary can provide an interesting subtree, although Gaijin is adding too much copypaste and not unique modifications. Spain by itself can hardly bring something new to the tree imo, idea of Spain + Brazil is interesting, but I doubt we will ever get it, Brazil is probably reserved for smth like LATAM TT.
Yeah, but the way I would have done it (personally) would be Minor Axis and Spain in Italy until ~Rank V, at which point when the Cold War eras start it becomes just Spain and Minor Axis nations get their own tree, starting at Rank V and requiring a nation (Italy or USSR in this case) like Israel; as most (if not all) minor axis nations would become part of the Warsaw Pact
There is also a improved linebacker called the Bradley SHORAD “Linebacker 2” Demonstrator (*Linebacker 2 is not an official name and this is the only video/article I can find that mentions this name most refer to it as Bradley SHORAD or SHORAD Bradley)
I do not know if any work continued since 2017 as there isn’t alot of information on this vehicle online.
1 Like
Update #13
Added:
M6 Bradley Linebacker (USA)
MSI-DS Terrahawk Paladin (UK)
OF40 Cheetah (Italy)
PRTL GWI Cheetah (France - BeNeLux)
NASAMS MML (Sweden - Norway)
1 Like
Update #14
Added:
- Object 1040 “Ellipse” (Russia)
- T38 Stilet (Russia - Belarus)
- AMX 30 Javelot (France)
1 Like
Update #15
Added:
- 9K37 Buk (Russia)
- G6-HVM Suggestion Added (UK)
- LY-70 CV (China)
- K808 AAGW (South Korea)
- PASARS-16 NG (Serbia)
- M-90 Sava (Yugoslavia)
1 Like
G6 mounts 8. Why they mounted 4 at the moment of taking picutres is a mystery that most likely will never be answered.
Spoiler
3 Likes
Update #16
Added:
- NMS 195 Robot 70 (Sweden - Norway)
- AD-08 Majid (Iran)
- Dezful (Iran
- Zoubin (Iran)
- ZSU-23-4M-A1 ‘Rokach’ (Ukraine)
- BURC (Turkey)
- Pirana 6x6 Blowpipe (Chile)
2 Likes
Radar of the G6-HVM
2 Likes
I thought that the SLAMRAAM/NASAMS had a range of ~15km with AIM-120Bs, and ~25km with AIM-120C-7s (and that the SLAMRAAM-ER was just an AIM-120C-7)?
While its been awhile, I think AIM-120 regardless of version are going to lower range because they don’t have a booster rocket. Wear as the SL-AMRAAM has a added booster rocket which gives it it’s extended range.
Update #17
Added:
- ZSU Matador (Germany)
- Starburst AVL (UK)
- ZA-HVM (UK - South Africa)
- Cactus Crotale (UK - South Africa)
- Ch’ŏnma-216 (2013) (North Korea)
Get ready, as soon
If you need anything about that, feel free to ask. Afterall the RU suggestion is basically mine, tho it is outdated a little
I had to dig through a few threads to find your Ru Suggestion.
While a little unrelated to ZA, do you have any additional info on the Starburst AVL? That’s what im calling it, couldn’t find a more proper name.
I had to dig through the the Stormer HVM Thread just for the singular picture. I couldn’t find any additional info on it. Looks like a Stormer Chassis with Starburst missiles instead of Star-streaks.
Also good suggestions, keep up the work. Hopefully you will single handily get a SAVH-3 vehicle in the game.
Sure, give me some time.