Update #21
Part 1 Additions
- M458 Eagle (US)
Part 2 Additions
- RBS 70 VLM (Sweden)
- ATILGAN PMSS (Turkey)
- Vuran SUNGUR (Turkey)
- Arlan 4x4 PMI (Kazakhstan)
- MT-LB IMLS (Kazakhstan)
Update #21
Part 1 Additions
Part 2 Additions
the ranges are switched around and calibres for both are 165mm
Thank you and corrected.
Update #22
Part 1 Additions
Part 2 Additions
Update #23
Part 1 Additions
Part 2 Additions
I have been linked?
Do you have relevant links for information about SPAAs that I haven’t seen?
You linked his response in Cactus SAHV instead of the suggestion itself.
oops. Didn’t even notice.
Update #24
Part 1 Additions
Part 2 Additions

Bit more info on it.
Update #25
Part 1 Additions
Update #26
Part 2 Additions
TRIDON Mk.1 (Sweden)
ItPsv SU-57-2M - Ps 462 (Sweden - Finland)
PZA SA-35 (Poland)
K-31 Cheonma uses missiles that domestic developed by LIG Nexone, not VT1. If you look at pictures or videos of the Crotale and Cheonma missiles, it is easy to see that they have different shapes.








Do you know from when the academic paper is? Im asking, because SAHV is listed as 128kg with 6km ceiling and 1998 introduction date. That data is weird.
The Chinese Crotale systems have very different missiles though, definitely not VT-1s though I agree.
Update #27
Part 2 Additions
I-Dome SAM (Israel)
M-1985 (North Korea)
Added K-31 Cheonma Missile to K-31 (South Korea)
The specs for the other two non-Cheonma systems are not reliable; we only need to look at the column for Cheonma in this table.
If I remember correctly, this paper was probably around 1997-1998 (yes, that is really old paper), and since this is an academic paper and not an internal military report for a serious performance review, so the paper’s authors relied heavily on what was readily available: Janes.
Ok, thanks.
Well, even if the Janes were used, then the only thing that would make sense is 6km ceiling.