I know this. But I think they’re avoiding discord even more than with Russian missiles. Let me repeat, the developer doesn’t actually know how Russian missiles work. That’s why they’re in the game in a simplified form. Brimstones could be implemented in the same simplified way. And instead of 12, give us just 6 per plane. That would significantly balance the game.
1 Like
So long as it didnt impact air modes (and thus the full 18x Brimstone could be taken in ARB and ASB) then no one would have issue with this
1 Like
before yall add anything please fix my ADATS first
Hahaha the meme disappeared
Wasn’t even notified which is amazing, it’s not against any rules from what I know and I see them all over the place.
1 Like
You understand that it won’t happen like that, right? I’m sure the developers won’t remove Russian missiles, and we have the option to push for an alternative in the form of tweaking Brimstones. If they give us 6, that would be great. Because in ARB, most targets are in the air. At least, that’s how it is for me.
kolibri pistol vs GAU-19
1 Like
Unless you play a ground attacker like the Tornado Gr4 in ASB… in which case. The Full 18x Brimstone loadout would be fun to deal with Convoys.
Besides I dont see them limiting GBU-39 carriers to only 8 (2 racks) because it would be too OP in air modes
I think we should first aim to get at least 6 missiles. If we push for more, as you suggest, the developers will say we’re asking for too much. I’m convinced that the developers are listening to players less and less and are tweaking things the way they see fit. So, I believe these discussions are just a place to vent emotions.
I am against the KH38 being in the game as much as the next guy but people misunderstand the minimum requirements for something to be added into the game. For Gaijin the existence of the booster, warhead and inertial/gps guidance systems that are used on the ML are enough reason for the MT version to be allowed in game, this is the same case for multiple vehicles, like the Ho-229, kikka, f-16aj, E100, Ho-Ri, Sidam Mistral, Heavt tank no.6 etc. I dont think Gaijin cares if the seeker was built or tested as much you guys think, they will never react to this drama because they dont think its an issue at all.
1 Like
Well shit if that’s the case I have a “bridge to sell you” about IIR hellfires.
The issue is more so less peculiar favoritism, but more so about the lower bound of what could / should be added. especially when said additions are contentious and massively impact the meta and balancing factors.
1 Like
The Mach 4+ Heat-Warhead, Ground attack ASRAAMs called the Typhoon are going to be really fun
I mean make a suggestion, i think it would have a decent chance of passing. Hell a very obscure early Italian air to air missile that was probably never mounted or tested was passed as a suggestion a while ago
1 Like
Again make a suggestion, i think they have decent chance of being added if Gaijin wants to. The main problem here is balance decisions and that Gaijin leans heavy towards giving Russia the upper hand especially in cas, not the existence of certain parts of certain missiles, gaijin doesn’t give a damn about that and its clear imo.
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/k9MVurZNy798
I asked for evidence. Of course they just close the topic.
What is this Karen energy ilke the whole worlds owes them something
1 Like
nations dont get nerfed for no reason…
Just educate yourself on what vehicles they have. Russia is supposed to be mid, and it is
Run your own business and customers are due explanations when asked. Top tier isn’t playable let alone enjoyable thanks to the complete and utter ignorance towards balance. Ask anyone if they believe that it is balanced and 9 out of 10 will answer it isn’t. Spare me your criticism
2 Likes
They should get rid of the Yak-9K’s paper APHE while they’re at it
Neither did the flares on the F-5C
Or missile HMD on the A-10C and F-15E (year model depicted ingame)
Or the IRST of the Yak-141
Or the entiretey of the F-16AJ that is depicted ingame.
Or R-27; Sedjil on the F-14A.
And many more examples.
1 Like
I said it last time and I repeat, there was a huge topic about this same subject that was closed by the moderators, which was correct, of the many people there, few were actually debating the existence of this missile, creating more topics about the same subject is not cool and I hope that some moderator closes it soon so as not to cause more discord since instead of a debate about the existence of the missile, people were just talking about things that were off topic.
1 Like