Here is proof KH38MTs are non-existent other than on paper

Game Discussion General Discussion
21

i mean the thread probably gonna get locked again anyways
and gaijin would still ignore it

2 Likes
22

well someone died to a Kh-38MT and oppened a thread as their natural reaction, nothing new
image

4 Likes
23

Why would they need to? “Man in the Loop” guidance has been replaced wholesale with bog standard Electro-Optical Correlation seeking, as have “Contrast” Seekers, as a gaming convention.

Brimestones along side the AGM-114L could absolutely be implemented tomorrow with performance copied directly from Contemporary missiles with no issue.

3 Likes
24

I know this. But I think they’re avoiding discord even more than with Russian missiles. Let me repeat, the developer doesn’t actually know how Russian missiles work. That’s why they’re in the game in a simplified form. Brimstones could be implemented in the same simplified way. And instead of 12, give us just 6 per plane. That would significantly balance the game.

1 Like
25

So long as it didnt impact air modes (and thus the full 18x Brimstone could be taken in ARB and ASB) then no one would have issue with this

1 Like
26

before yall add anything please fix my ADATS first

27

Hahaha the meme disappeared

Wasn’t even notified which is amazing, it’s not against any rules from what I know and I see them all over the place.

Spoiler

IMG_0029
IMG_00291284×824 692 KB

1 Like
28

You understand that it won’t happen like that, right? I’m sure the developers won’t remove Russian missiles, and we have the option to push for an alternative in the form of tweaking Brimstones. If they give us 6, that would be great. Because in ARB, most targets are in the air. At least, that’s how it is for me.

29

kolibri pistol vs GAU-19

1 Like
30

Unless you play a ground attacker like the Tornado Gr4 in ASB… in which case. The Full 18x Brimstone loadout would be fun to deal with Convoys.

Besides I dont see them limiting GBU-39 carriers to only 8 (2 racks) because it would be too OP in air modes

31

I think we should first aim to get at least 6 missiles. If we push for more, as you suggest, the developers will say we’re asking for too much. I’m convinced that the developers are listening to players less and less and are tweaking things the way they see fit. So, I believe these discussions are just a place to vent emotions.

32

I am against the KH38 being in the game as much as the next guy but people misunderstand the minimum requirements for something to be added into the game. For Gaijin the existence of the booster, warhead and inertial/gps guidance systems that are used on the ML are enough reason for the MT version to be allowed in game, this is the same case for multiple vehicles, like the Ho-229, kikka, f-16aj, E100, Ho-Ri, Sidam Mistral, Heavt tank no.6 etc. I dont think Gaijin cares if the seeker was built or tested as much you guys think, they will never react to this drama because they dont think its an issue at all.

1 Like
33

Well shit if that’s the case I have a “bridge to sell you” about IIR hellfires.

The issue is more so less peculiar favoritism, but more so about the lower bound of what could / should be added. especially when said additions are contentious and massively impact the meta and balancing factors.

1 Like
34

The Mach 4+ Heat-Warhead, Ground attack ASRAAMs called the Typhoon are going to be really fun

35

I mean make a suggestion, i think it would have a decent chance of passing. Hell a very obscure early Italian air to air missile that was probably never mounted or tested was passed as a suggestion a while ago

1 Like
36

Again make a suggestion, i think they have decent chance of being added if Gaijin wants to. The main problem here is balance decisions and that Gaijin leans heavy towards giving Russia the upper hand especially in cas, not the existence of certain parts of certain missiles, gaijin doesn’t give a damn about that and its clear imo.

1 Like
37

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/k9MVurZNy798

I asked for evidence. Of course they just close the topic.

38

What is this Karen energy ilke the whole worlds owes them something

1 Like
39

nations dont get nerfed for no reason…

Just educate yourself on what vehicles they have. Russia is supposed to be mid, and it is

40

Run your own business and customers are due explanations when asked. Top tier isn’t playable let alone enjoyable thanks to the complete and utter ignorance towards balance. Ask anyone if they believe that it is balanced and 9 out of 10 will answer it isn’t. Spare me your criticism

2 Likes