can its STR be fixed pls. it currently cant even win a guns only 1v1 with 7.0 jets…
We can’t make it sustain 6g without changing the FM
As such not a bug
Arent models done externally and managed by an entirely different team?
I think there is a visual model and flight model team.
So 2 teams that do 2 different things.
I’m not 100% sure though so don’t quote me on that.
Pay attention to Smin’s wording. “Resolved”. That can mean “dismissed”. That should be the expected treatment of British vehicles by Gaijin by now.
2 Likes
That’s a concept that many players still struggle with. ;-)
I think even within the modelling teams, the people who do external models, cockpit, skins, etc. may even be different people.
1 Like
The war thunder models always look beautiful.
Flight models are another story.
Yes, but I often am a tad disappointed by the quality of the skins - but then that opens the possibility for custom creations, which really often are outstanding…
1 Like
That is true some have 2012 levels of resolution lol.
1 Like
True, best example is the Eurofighters. The guys making custom skins for them are a godsend for it, fixing the cockpit buttons, the interior HUD tint, and the exterior of the German Typhoons all of which should have been sorted when they added them.
It’s a shame Gaijin doesn’t let people make custom HUDs/MFDs/HMDs given how poorly a lot of them are handled.
5 Likes
So we got the ability to remove the gunpod on the Hawk 209. Unfortunately as it is removing it has no effect on flight performance. I made a bug report on it. Please check it out and click “You have same issue” if you agree with the content.
[DEV] Hawk 209 30 mm gunpod has no effect on flight performance // Gaijin.net // Issues
Unfortunately without any performance data manuals the will likely reject this report.
2 Likes
Then it will be the last bug report I will ever make. I don’t doubt they will.
Yes, I personally would advise against getting involved or interested in correcting this particular aircraft.
From personal experience I can tell you they (gaijin devs) do not give a damn about the Hawk.
You’ll just waste your time like I did my time.
2 Likes
Well technically our radar hawk should have a gun there.
So its correct for the hawk with sky flash
1 Like
Thanks, I added this to the bug report.
Anyone if you can please click “You have same issue” on the bug report.
I guess I should be just happy the way it is as they could always break it more. Right now the drag penalty is very small according to statshark and also the gun is firing from closer to the fuselage than it should. So it’s at least better with the pod installed as it should be.
This thing will be blatantly OP in sim with the PD radar it’s receiving. They’ll probably not touch the flight model when adding the radar so it will get it for “free”. And of course they will leave the BR at 10.3 until 2028 at least .
2 Likes
A man can hopium it comes to the RDA too…
2 Likes
The lack of gun is at least reflected in the stats and flight performance. But I do wonder if in real life the RDA fitted with a radar is 10 kg lighter than the regular 200 without one but with an internal gun. Right now it’s the best performing Hawk at least.
BTW Gaijin did this again with the Me 210. The early A-1 models with the DB 601 engines weight the same to the fraction of a kilo than the later models with the bigger and heavier DB 605 engines. You can’t even try to report this because the information is only available through a datamine, and they refuse all bug reports with datamines. That’s why I included the “performance test” in the Hawk 209 bug report and made no mention of the incorrect weight available through datamine.