Honestly it doesn’t seem “worth it” as an aircraft - the base 200, you’re getting a IR missile only subsonic jet with not great flight performance at 10.7, and the RDA you’re losing the guns, going up to 11.3, and getting two “ehhh” SARHs/9Ls for it. What also grinds my gears is the RP cost. 350k RP for the 200 seems excessive by any stretch, which in my case completely puts me off grinding it.
No current new developments im afriad.
1 Like
If there are clipping or modeling issues with any current aircraft, then as always, they should be reported for investigation. Its either an issue with the gear door animation or an incorrect loadout.
3 Likes
Submit a report saying the weapons clip with the landing gear and see what happens I guess.
1 Like
The point im trying to make is that gaijin makes tiny modelling errors for balance all the time and it hurts absolutely nobody, so why are the suddenly so stubborn about the Hawk?
5 Likes
Its British.
13 Likes
This is without even mentioning the below-expected flight performance, which has not yet been corrected.
2 Likes
Just curious… when the Hawk 200 pings someone with its radar, does the RWR say its a hawk or does it claim an F16 or anything like that?
Just a random thought given the radars based on an F16 radar iirc.
Welp time for other nations to get the Hawk
1 Like
I do wonder which tree, I assume Japans getting it.
Not an issue imo, Japan could use a nice lil plane :)
Though oof, woulda helped me if it was a GE plane haha, I got like 4k GE sitting doing nuffin.
Thing is I legit think this might be a clone of the 200 with a radar lol
Imagine its a direct clone with a gunpod ha.
nah it gets a gunpod as its the later production hawk so that bump that could probs equip a gunpod isn’t there for that model
1 Like
bruh
where did you get that from lol
Well ofc, lol. UK cant get the fun toys even when in the devblog (cough 25mm cough)
2 Likes
1 Like
so its legit a better 200 then ours lol
1 Like
wack
