The point im trying to make is that gaijin makes tiny modelling errors for balance all the time and it hurts absolutely nobody, so why are the suddenly so stubborn about the Hawk?
6 Likes
Its British.
14 Likes
This is without even mentioning the below-expected flight performance, which has not yet been corrected.
2 Likes
Just curious… when the Hawk 200 pings someone with its radar, does the RWR say its a hawk or does it claim an F16 or anything like that?
Just a random thought given the radars based on an F16 radar iirc.
Welp time for other nations to get the Hawk
1 Like
I do wonder which tree, I assume Japans getting it.
Not an issue imo, Japan could use a nice lil plane :)
Though oof, woulda helped me if it was a GE plane haha, I got like 4k GE sitting doing nuffin.
Thing is I legit think this might be a clone of the 200 with a radar lol
Imagine its a direct clone with a gunpod ha.
nah it gets a gunpod as its the later production hawk so that bump that could probs equip a gunpod isn’t there for that model
1 Like
bruh
where did you get that from lol
Well ofc, lol. UK cant get the fun toys even when in the devblog (cough 25mm cough)
2 Likes
1 Like
so its legit a better 200 then ours lol
1 Like
wack
The only bump thats missing is the one under the cockpit which was different from the other bump the devs were talking about.
Other than that it looks no different. Obviously we won’t be able to see properly until the dev server but from what can be seen the belly looks the exact same.
I guess we can ask for/beg a Omani Hawk 203…
5 Likes
what do you wanna bet its at the same br as the 200
gaijin “we dont wanna get premiums better then tech tree” snail
It only has 9P-4’s. The missiles are indeed worse, but I am of the opinion the lack of a gun is more important than that.