Has no one raised objections to the main battle tank's power supply system?

For this update, the internal composition added a power supply system. Except for the power supply systems of the main battle tanks of the Russian Federation being enclosed within the main armor, the power supply systems of other tanks are almost all located outside the main armor and can be easily damaged by artillery support or even machine guns. This is a very obvious double standard, as can also be seen from Germany’s new main battle tank, the Leopard 2A8. What Gaijin calls ‘balance’ is only the balance they believe in.

Additionally, in the issue section, many reasonable and evidence-supported suggestions are rejected for inexplicable reasons. Whether a suggestion is reasonable or not, they only accept suggestions that they personally consider reasonable.

Furthermore, who still remembers that the initial detailing of tank internal structures was just to balance the over-penetration issues of some armor-vulnerable vehicles? Now, it has evolved to where main battle tanks are becoming increasingly fragile. Excessive detailing greatly reduces playability. Once certain parts are easily damaged, resulting in decreased combat capability and requiring a lot of time to repair the vehicle, the game loses its meaning.

1 Like

I mean, what can really be done? If this is where the PSUs are these are the systems that are powered/controlled by them then what really can be changed?

why would we oppose APUs?

Think he’s talking about vehicle batteries not APUs.

either way, i see no issues