but do you agree that Russia top tier is OP?
Nope.
1 Like
are you playing Russia or German, try to play as US and feel the pain
I played 8/10 nations in the game and couldn’t really see bias towards a single nation.
2 Likes
I play China, Israel, Sweden, Britain, and Italy. Russia has no bias.
1 Like
No biased…What other nations has magic ERA that stops any weapon in the game?
What nation has the best CAS and SAM in game
Russia is pure biased it was balanced at 5.7 but as we go up it becomes stupid.
They have had vehicles that are so hilariously under tiered they break the game.
how long was the 906 at 7.7 while having a stab and autoloader. Facing French autoloaders with no stab and only Ap rounds.
I could write pages of Russian Bias
1 Like
Have you considered not shooting at the extremely thick and angled armour? Trust me, shoot anywhere else besides the most armoured part, and they are eliminated extremely easily.
Best SPAA? Yeah, what’s your point? All SPAAs should be as powerful, unfortunately NATO doctrine does not support SPAAs. They kinda prefer missile systems over a truck with a missile.
Best CAS is debatable. F-16s and F-15Es are more annoying.
Just because you personally are bad at the game and want to shoot the thickest part of a tank does not mean it is bias. Learn to play, learn to shoot, and you’ll be happier.
1 Like
You mean 90% of the tank…Russian tanks have been buffed and stealth buffed for years, first it was the side shots would destroy the ammo (they reduced the percentage chance of that)
Russian tanks had no thermals so Gaijin just added a tank that didn’t have thermals to help Russia.
Gaijin ignore anti era tips on NATO rounds.
Gaijin have added the autoloader as a module yet it creates no spall and doesn’t kill the tank.
T-90M acts like a modern day Maus…Same tank that was disabled by an M3 25mm autocannon…and we have seen tandem ATGMs regularly destroy them from the front and side (try it in game Relikt stops everything)
Su-30 and KH-38 is the best CAS aircraft in the game, no NATO tank survives a KH-38 hit but Relikt armoured tanks will eat an AGM-65/Brimstone and Hellfire into the front plate.
You would be ok with NATO tanks having correctly modelled composites and NERA then?
That would make the M1A2 SEP, the CR2 and the Leopard 2A7 (STRV 122) immune to Russian 3BM60
Its ok though bro just aim for the “weak spots”
2 Likes
it really doesn’t, honestly they arent much worse than any other T64 descendant,
I’m not denying its armour is overperforming against fire especially from nato ordinance but top tier russian tanks really arent horrid to deal with.
1 Like
A shot to the autoloader doesn’t blow it up? Mate, how about aiming? I can go do a 1v1 with my Russian main friend right now and I’ll show you those things blow up to everything. Maybe practice, that’s what I do.
Also stealth buffed? Right, you mean you’re a German player and can’t see a stationary tank like a T-Rex.
Also it wasn’t disabled, the crew left it. Otherwise shall I bring up how a drunken Russian sniper took out an Abrams crew by making the Ukrainians so scared they left the tank and were shot down as they left? Looks like 7.62R can defeat Abrams.
And sure, why not? I main other countries besides Russia, sorry I don’t crutch on biases.
1 Like
Not really bud it is an absolute beast, Relikt is a broken over performing mess. Relikt is 2 plates
sandwiched between a spacer…Why didn’t NATO think to try that why even bother with composite armoured arrays when 2 plates and a spacer makes your tank immune.
Sorry but all Russian ERA needs to be correctly modelled.
the autoloader getting hit doesnt make its turret enter orbit like it realistically would, especially as most USSR tank players carry very little ammo because of the design flaw.
but yea struggling with them is a skill issue must admit.
top tier russias only good parts are SPAA and CAS, the rest is pretty poor
2 Likes
i refer to previous messages
Not a German main but cool assumption British L27A1 (Britains top tier round regularly does not OHK a Russian T-90M or T-80BVM)
As I said if Russian tanks are fine why cant we have NATO tanks with the correct armour values?
because there’s no legally accessible information on how good Chobham or AMAP is
1 Like
This was last game breach shot…
except it didn’t destroy the breach or injure the crew or damage the autoloader. But sure skill issue for aiming for the weak spots effectively
Do you know where he had to aim to kill me? Well anywhere
That’s the weakness map for 3BM22…That’s Russias 9.3 top round
This is what the T-90M is
you got unlucky with spall.
from that screenshot being from the world widest computer monitor it looks like you are using a challenger 2e.
if you’re not hull down or sniping you’re using it wrong, its also not as badly protected as everyone claims.
admittedly my challenger of choice is the OES or Black Night which are the best protected but they are all extremely hardy all things given
2 Likes
Plus the turret tossing is more of a T-72 thing because they used to just throw ammunition wherever they wanted. T-90 introduced this cool new thing: storage. Therefore, rounds weren’t bouncing around and sending people into the stratosphere. Now they were in a specific area ready to be loaded into the autoloader.
1 Like
wide ass monitor where 16;9 cant see a thing
yea that’s really not awful. lose driver or generic breechings that all tanks suffer from
So what you are saying is I need to play Russia/USA/Germany or Sweden to be able to deal with the T-90Ms…Does that seem right to you from a gameplay perspective?
Maybe we increase the penetration of the shyte tanks that have nothing going for them and reduce the fire power for the tanks that have amazing armour/mobility etc. or we reduce armour ERA to realistic levels and stop the Russians from the absolute cope
Yes it’s a wide screen monitor handy for work