kh-38mt is better than 65d wdym
not quite the worst but yeah d is a better comparison even if it is still much worse
e and a are worse than b
Guessing because it’s the only Mav that can be carried on triple racks, unless you’re in a Harrier or Gripen you gut your own payload bringing better Mavericks.
Pretty sure 15E can carry triple mav ds
oh
I thought I read Ds earlier
yeah I have no idea why you’d compare 65B/Kh-38
A, B, and D can all be on triple in game
IRL at least 2 on a triple can be G/F
I was wondering if anything even used A/B at top tier and you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for things like the F-16AJ, 65D should be the comparison (it’s still worse than Kh-38 but w/e)
I rolled into this misreading it as 65D vs SAPHE warhead 65G Mavs since ppl usually complain about the HEAT warheads being unreliable, the latter being single mounts only in game as you know.
yeah not much uses a/b at top tier but f16a which is 12.0 for ground rb is also b mav only
the only things I can think of with a mavs are a7d and one of the isreali skyhawks
Oh sure when the last time US CAS dominate top tier? If you talking about F-16C Russia already have Pantsir to intercept Mav easily you know the same SPAA Russia got because no spaa can deal with Harrier GR7 and Tornado IDS yet Russia is the only one who get it.
Genuine question I can’t even remember the last time US CAS dominated top tier.
It can’t be when the F-16C was introduced since the pantsir was added alongside it.
The Mig-27 was a menace if I remember correctly.
Was it the F-4E?
The budget is high because US arms manufacturers are private companies:
That means they sell stuff for as much profit as possible! Remember the 96k bag of bolts for the US airforce?
Imagine spending billions and bragging about it, and the end result looks like something held together with duct tape.
1 Like
fr fr
Cause there is no. Russian biased simply does not exist. The only thing weird that could be brought up is the CAS/SPAA argument but then again , that just prove that only now you sheeper actually wake up and realize that “Wait CAS is super OP we should do something about it”. Too little too late, way too damn late and it always go with “Russian biased” like a side dish. The reason why we not getting more SPAA simply as Gaijin doesn’t care and SPAA are not that popular. Along with people are kind of allergic to SPAA because their reward suck and their gameplay suck. Adding jet in with newer armament sell more , who would have thought ?
1 Like
Funny enough when MiG-27K was there they said “Spawn SPAA bro”
but then Harrier GR7 and Tornado IDS do the same to them they cry it too OP and need better SPAA
Aint the same thing happening now ? Lmao , not even wait till the damn Su-34 get added. The moment the russian get their Pantsir , people already asking for better SPAA for other nation ? Lord save me from these cherry picking
It doesn’t help that NATO doesn’t utilise SPAAs in general: they use air defence system. Which means they cannot roll up in a pickup and fire a missile in the sky and drive off like the Pantsir can.
1 Like
Oh Tornado GR4 can’t have FnF brimstone because no SPAA can’t counter it according to gaijin which is true
But allowed SU-34 to do very same thing that Tornado GR4 aren’t allowed to do and what funny about it?
both planes introduced at the same times too
Yeah no double standard No Russia bias all right
sht you must be so blind to don’t see this double standard BS
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Yes, currently right now, since 2022 as well.