You think?
You remember when Russia can’t deal with Harrier GR7 and Tornado IDS with their 2S6 (even ITO can’t deal with those too) and shortly after they got pantsir
Compare to this after third KH-38 slinger still no better AA for other
or Tornado GR4 which came the same times as SU-34 and don’t allow to have FnF Brimstone because no SPAA can counter it but allowed SU-34 with KH-38 to do the very same thing that Tornado aren’t allowed to do? on better platform too if Gaijin don’t display their double standard behavior like this i might not believe on that sht too but because they do on the display.
4 Likes
Remember when US dominated AIR and Ground Battles bc of CAS?
Was that US Bias?
Huh? Su-30SM seems like a perfectly competitive aircraft at the moment. Is it meta? maybe not. But it has the second best radar at top tier. The greatest compliemnt of AAMs at top tier (both variety and quantity) and a perfectly capable flight performance. Can you dominate every match like the Mig-23 and Mig-29 use to? No, but to call it
“mid” is rather dishonest
@MagicalMeth The only posts that claimed CAS wasn’t OP was Pompous’s, and the implications from claiming Pantsir is good.
That and all that proves is the enemy team was infinitely less skilled than you.
This shouldn’t have struck anybody as abnormal as we all know that the USA has the strongest military on earth, you shouldn’t have doubt a nation that doesn’t do free healthcare and has fighter jets that cost more than small countries.
1 Like
keep in mind the military budget of USA is ~2.5x compare to the entire Europe itself
tho im pretty sure atleast 20% of them are also result of corruption but every country has a little corruption here and there so
There IS a difference…russian aircraft carry MORE and they are much FASTER. Pantsir can shoot down the slow agm’s…I have NEVER been able to shoot down a kh in an ADATS. F16 for example carries 4 agm which may get you one to two kills if all 4 are launched. KH will net you avg 3-4 kills if all six are launched.
kh-38mt are also more accurate than 65b
kh-38mt are always guarantee kill because of the explosive mass
i got kill when im speeding 83kph with the hstvl by the 38mt that land like 4m away
A hammer landing 4m away would have killed you
Heck even probably a AGM65G landing 4m away would have killed you
Also why are you guys comparing 65B to a Kh-38?
because kh is just better?
I don’t disagree per se. But why the worse mav of the bunch?
kh-38mt is better than 65d wdym
not quite the worst but yeah d is a better comparison even if it is still much worse
e and a are worse than b
Guessing because it’s the only Mav that can be carried on triple racks, unless you’re in a Harrier or Gripen you gut your own payload bringing better Mavericks.
Pretty sure 15E can carry triple mav ds
oh
I thought I read Ds earlier
yeah I have no idea why you’d compare 65B/Kh-38
A, B, and D can all be on triple in game
IRL at least 2 on a triple can be G/F
I was wondering if anything even used A/B at top tier and you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel for things like the F-16AJ, 65D should be the comparison (it’s still worse than Kh-38 but w/e)
I rolled into this misreading it as 65D vs SAPHE warhead 65G Mavs since ppl usually complain about the HEAT warheads being unreliable, the latter being single mounts only in game as you know.
yeah not much uses a/b at top tier but f16a which is 12.0 for ground rb is also b mav only
the only things I can think of with a mavs are a7d and one of the isreali skyhawks
Oh sure when the last time US CAS dominate top tier? If you talking about F-16C Russia already have Pantsir to intercept Mav easily you know the same SPAA Russia got because no spaa can deal with Harrier GR7 and Tornado IDS yet Russia is the only one who get it.