Has anyone felt the bias yet?

i would be pissed tbh. Intercepting these buggers in an ADATS is already hard enough i would imagine

1 Like

i hate it here

I never said the AASM is better. Don’t put words in my mouth.

I was saying in the fact anything with 20 KM range or greater is highly potent, no matter the nation or missile.

The AASM is a slower but very similar weapon to the KH-38, and they both have enough explosive mass to annihilate anything it will touch with a semi direct hit.

Also where did you get that data from?

1 Like

You haven’t got the worse yet :

you intercept the missile, it blows up, and 5 seconds later it kills you anyway (i assume it is server desync)

It’s not just and RU thing though… I’ve seen this happen on all sorts of jets.

Even in air to air I’ve seen it happen.

yeah but it happen to me so many time when i play ADATS
its just phased through

It’s probably happened to you more than you realize in other nations… you just believe it’s happened more in the adts

1 Like

no im pretty sure ito can intercept missiles better than this thing
ive seen ito do that
adats
rare if not never
you dont play adats as much as me so you dont know
even if i say i only know the alphabet i would still know more than you

Yes i don’t disagree on this particular point.

The KH38 is more potent than its competition due to sheer speed, that’s all. In that manner there is an unbalance, especially considering most nations don’t even have a competent AA to intercept it, and those who do are far less reaction time than the other way around. In that sense, an unbalance exists. That’s all.

Gszabi is a quite known dataminer. Basically looks in the files in each update, he even has a git repository. That’s one of the most reliable source you can get weaponry and machinery wise.

ITO can do it more reliably because of the tracking radar. That being said, i don’t think it would have changed anything if you were in an ITO here. I had that bug occur on a fair amount of missiles i tried to intercept as well.

Here’s the problem if they remove it.

  1. What replaces it? Every other nation outside of RU has had IR weapons for a long time. The KA-52 and Mi-28Nm are also lacking their IR ATGMs.

  2. This would upset many players who ground it out for the ability to “fight back” dare I say.

  3. Something will replace it in another tech tree as it always has, in this case, most likely brimstone spam all over again

1 Like

almost every spaa can do it reliably more than adats
i cant even lock irst when theres a bit of cloud behind the planes

the last thing we need is another top tier CAS
we need tank only mode the most
we need better SAM or spaa

Me:


You:
(Note, to fill up the first page I had to set yours to rank 8, 7, 6)
Your also level 70, and have less than 5k games in total
Your positive in most tanks other than the MBT-70, so this leads me to believe USA isn’t suffering in the slightest

1 Like

yeah ur USA kd and the amount of games you play are absolute abhorent
whats there to show?

Because I’m not a USA main? Lmao.

Thanks for proving my point :)

@LegitRussianBias

1 Like

I have two answers :

  • First one would be the one i would have gave you if we were 2 years ago : I seem to remember SU34 being able to carry KH29TE. It has around 30km of range, but at least it’s slower, so competent AA have a chance to fight back. Earlier variant of KH could also be a thing, since you would need to at least get in danger for CAS.
  • Second one is considering the fact that devs are working on multiple chassis AA : Give every nation a SAM system that is fire and forget (fair since CAS also has F&F) and that has about the same range as the best AGM that exists (the effective range being around 20-30 km)

They could have had a refund

Yes it’s an other can of worms because of quantity. That being said the brimstone is currently miserable and even those who main the EF wouldn’t be opposed to having their loadout limited in quantity if they could get F&F like everyone, from the few interaction i had with them.

exactly so you cant go and tell other players to act this on ADATS or ADATS is good
or that US tech tree is good yall coping, shit like that
u got RU hand holding over there
hell you dont even have ADATS

His USA light tank KD is identical to his Soviet KD… what are you on about?
It’s also average to above average for light tanks, and good for most MBTs.

His M1 KVT with its substandard round is similar to his stats in T-72B3 and T-80BVM, and better than T-80U.

His M1A1 Click Bait has similar stats to his T-90M.

His posts can and likely are wrong about ADATS, but his stats prove he’s not a nation main and nothing he plays is OP.

2 Likes

Only problem with the TV guided agms is that the Russian ones usually miss, because you can simply drive out of the captured image.
The difference betweeen KH-29 and 38 is 0.4 Mach.

In addition, I think brimstones have been the only thing to be able to score a nuke, after spawning a plane so far, which is saying something.
At least whom I’ve talked to say they’re typically more potent.

I think what a lot of people dislike, and wasn’t the case with the Su-34, is the Su-30 gets a thermal, which means easy target acquisition. Something everyone else had for many years.
Pair a good optic with a good weapon, and your in business…
I think raising sp costs of all planes by an additional 4% for every nation would help this problem somewhat.

To add to this, I personally enjoy helicopters. But helicopters have become useless, as spaa can put range you most of the time now. And things with Fim-92Ks can kill you no matter what if your in range.
Then you have the plane spam that comes to kill you… like sheesh I just want to play my helicopters…

1 Like