if by my stat Ariete must be very OP, don’t you think?
yeah, i pull 5.2 on it if it sucks i can’t pull it right it must be very OP.
No? Ariete is irrelevent in this.
Besides, global stats show ariete have 1.35k/d, and 2s38 have 0.85
It is logical - if X is OP, you would see this in stats. Nobody can show how it is overperforming
Nobody claims ariete is OP. Yet everyone cry 2s38 is OP. And yet nobody can show that with stats. Simple as
Yup. Just like the other argument.
If you have good stats in it: “look, you have good stats so it is clearly op”.
If you have bad stats in it: “look, you cant even do well in an op vehicle. Your opinion doesnt matter”
it under BR
it pretty much smaller Otomatic minus radar but it overall better and can do more job
and what Otomatic sit at? 11.3
the vehicle in it of itself is definitely overpowered. however when people use an overpowered vehicle, its easy for them to just go in mindlessly because they think they can beat everything they face, then just put themselves in a bad position. That doesn’t make the 2S38 any less overpowered for its BR.
2S38 vs Puma (Both 10.3)
2S38 has a slightly longer reload (0.5s vs 0.2/0.3s), with 225mm of penetration (compared to 121mm) AND has HE-VT as it is a technically Anti-Air, is Amphibious (kinda irrelevant, but i love amphibious vehicles), has ESS and Entrenchment, has better armour and more survivability, same top speed. The 2S38 is blatantly better than the Puma.
I would certainly put the puma above the 2s38 for this
in my experience ive been able to dome Pumas but 2S38s often survive a direct shot, maybe my rounds just hate germans
That might be the case for your rounds. I have one shot the 2s38 98% of the time while the puma eats a round or 2 most times.
its also kinda cool that 2S38 can use APHE w/ more penetration than Puma’s APFSDS, if I ever use the 2S38 I might need to run APHE- such a fun round, even if not optimal
Sure thing bud
I don’t see you playing it.
And seeing you saying stuff like this:
just make me sure you don’t know what are you talking about
im having a lot of fun w/ 6.7 Japan Ground, I also don’t want to buy it, as I have no interest in the USSR Tree.
-oh and 11.3 GRB, where CAS isn’t overwhelming and I have an excuse to use F-5T and F-4EJ
literally admitted to it being my experience not even two comments below, the rest of it is still factual. just make me sure you have zero reading comprehension
You do not understand basic things - Your feelings does not mean anything of it is factual.
Facts =/= your feelings
same can also be apply to you about another vehicle as well.
2S38 supposingly having more survivability than Puma is laughable.
2S38 is a good vehicle, but it is slow, big, no gun depression and a glass cannon.
hence why i admitted i was wrong, i know its rare to find people admitting they were wrong abt something on these forums
You get fact checked and you resort to ad hominem, typical
?
So amazing indeed…
saying “facts =/= feelings” when you say I have no idea what I’m talking about because I got a single thing wrong (and admitted it) IS braindead. Yes I got it wrong, doesnt make your response not braindead?
You literally did not played any of these vehicles. Nor 2s38 or puma.
You only repeat an opinion that youtubers told you, and that: